| Komal's profileDr. Komal Shah-KapoorBlogLists | Help |
|
This user currently is not registered with Windows Live QnA account. Click here to learn more and get started. |
February 24 Swami Vivekanda... So, with a baby on the way, one of my goals is to read all 9 volumes of Swami Vivekanda. At 5 months, baby senses sound. This is the Introduction. I read it aloud...Baby, can you hear?? For the first time in history, as has been said elsewhere, Hinduism itself forms here the subject of generalisation of a Hindu mind of the highest order. For ages to come the Hindu man who would verify, the Hindu mother who would teach her children, what was the faith of their ancestors will turn to the pages of these books for assurance and light. Long after the English language has disappeared from India, the gift that has here been made, through that language, to the world, will remain and bear its fruit in East and West alike. What Hinduism had needed, was the organising and consolidating of its own idea. What the world had needed was a faith that had no fear of truth. Both these are found here. Nor could any greater proof have been given of the eternal vigour of the Sanâtana Dharma, of the fact that India is as great in the present as ever in the past, than this rise of the individual who, at the critical moment, gathers up and voices the communal consciousness. That India should have found her own need satisfied only in carrying to the humanity outside her borders the bread of life is what might have been foreseen. Nor did it happen on this occasion for the first time. It was once before in sending out to the sister lands the message of a nation-making faith that India learnt as a whole to understand the greatness of her own thought — a self-unification that gave birth to modern Hinduism itself. Never may we allow it to be forgotten that on Indian soil first was heard the command from a Teacher to His disciples: "Go ye out into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature!" It is the same thought, the same impulse of love, taking to itself a new shape, that is uttered by the lips of the Swami Vivekananda, when to a great gathering in the West he says: "If one religion true, then all the others also must be true. Thus the Hindu faith is yours as much as mine." And again, in amplification of the same idea: "We Hindus do not merely tolerate, we unite ourselves with every religion, praying in the mosque of the Mohammedan, worshipping before the fire of the Zoroastrian, and kneeling to the cross of the Christian. We know that all religions alike, from the lowest fetishism to the highest absolutism, are but so many attempts of the human soul to grasp and realise the Infinite. So we gather all these flowers, and, binding them together with the cord of love, make them into a wonderful bouquet of worship." To the heart of this speaker, none was foreign or alien. For him, there existed only Humanity and Truth. Of the Swami's address before the Parliament of Religions, it may be said that when he began to speak it was of "the religious ideas of the Hindus", but when he ended, Hinduism had been created. The moment was ripe with this potentiality. The vast audience that faced him represented exclusively the occidental mind, but included some development of all that in this was most distinctive. Every nation in Europe has poured in its human contribution upon America, and notably upon Chicago, where the Parliament was held. Much of the best, as well as some of the worst, of modern effort and struggle, is at all times to be met with, within the frontiers of that Western Civic Queen, whose feet are upon the shores of Lake Michigan, as she sits and broods, with the light of the North in her eyes. There is very little in the modern consciousness, very little inherited from the past of Europe, that does not hold some outpost in the city of Chicago. And while the teeming life and eager interests of that centre may seem to some of us for the present largely a chaos, yet they are undoubtedly making for the revealing of some noble and slow-wrought ideal of human unity, when the days of their ripening shall be fully accomplished. Such was the psychological area, such the sea of mind, young, tumultuous, overflowing with its own energy and self-assurance, yet inquisitive and alert withal, which confronted Vivekananda when he rose to speak. Behind him, on the contrary, lay an ocean, calm with long ages of spiritual development. Behind him lay a world that dated itself from the Vedas, and remembered itself in the Upanishads, a world to which Buddhism was almost modern; a world that was filled with religious systems of faiths and creeds; a quiet land, steeped in the sunlight of the tropics, the dust of whose roads had been trodden by the feet of the saints for ages upon ages. Behind him, in short, lay India, with her thousands of years of national development, in which she had sounded many things, proved many things, and realised almost all, save only her own perfect unanimity, from end to end of her great expanse of time and space, as to certain fundamental and essential truths, held by all her people in common. These, then, were the two mind-floods, two immense rivers of thought, as it were, Eastern and modern, of which the yellow-clad wanderer on the platform of the Parliament of Religions formed for a moment the point of confluence. The formulation of the common bases of Hinduism was the inevitable result of the shock of their contact, in a personality, so impersonal. For it was no experience of his own that rose to the lips of the Swami Vivekananda there. He did not even take advantage of the occasion to tell the story of his Master. Instead of either of these, it was the religious consciousness of India that spoke through him, the message of his whole people, as determined by their whole past. And as he spoke, in the youth and noonday of the West, a nation, sleeping in the shadows of the darkened half of earth, on the far side of the Pacific, waited in spirit for the words that would be borne on the dawn that was travelling towards them, to reveal to them the secret of their own greatness and strength. Others stood beside the Swami Vivekananda, on the same platform as he, as apostles of particular creeds and churches. But it was his glory that he came to preach a religion to which each of these was, in his own words, "only a travelling, a coming up, of different men, and women, through various conditions and circumstances to the same goal". He stood there, as he declared, to tell of One who had said of them all, not that one or another was true, in this or that respect, or for this or that reason, but that "All these are threaded upon Me, as pearls upon a string. Wherever thou seest extraordinary holiness and extraordinary power, raising and purifying humanity, know thou that I am there." To the Hindu, says Vivekananda, "Man is not travelling from error to truth, but climbing up from truth to truth, from truth that is lower to truth that is higher." This, and the teaching of Mukti — the doctrine that "man is to become divine by realising the divine," that religion is perfected in us only when it has led us to "Him who is the one life in a universe of death, Him who is the constant basis of an ever-changing world, that One who is the only soul, of which all souls are but delusive manifestations" — may be taken as the two great outstanding truths which, authenticated by the longest and most complex experience in human history, India proclaimed through him to the modern world of the West. For India herself, the short address forms, as has been said, a brief Charter of Enfranchisement. Hinduism in its wholeness the speaker bases on the Vedas, but he spiritualises our conception of the word, even while he utters it. To him, all that is true is Veda. "By the Vedas," he says, "no books are meant. They mean the accumulated treasury of spiritual laws discovered by different persons in different times." Incidentally, he discloses his conception of the Sanatana Dharma. "From the high spiritual flights of the Vedanta philosophy, of which the latest discoveries of science seem like echoes, to the lowest ideas of idolatry with its multifarious mythology, the agnosticism of the Buddhists, and the atheism of the Jains, each and all have a place in the Hindu's religion." To his mind, there could be no sect, no school, no sincere religious experience of the Indian people — however like an aberration it might seem to the individual — that might rightly be excluded from the embrace of Hinduism. And of this Indian Mother-Church, according to him, the distinctive doctrine is that of the Ishta Devatâ, the right of each soul to choose its own path, and to seek God in its own way. No army, then, carries the banner of so wide an Empire as that of Hinduism, thus defined. For as her spiritual goal is the finding of God, even so is her spiritual rule the perfect freedom of every soul to be itself. Yet would not this inclusion of all, this freedom of each, be the glory of Hinduism that it is, were it not for her supreme call, of sweetest promise: "Hear, ye children of immortal bliss! Even ye that dwell in higher spheres! For I have found that Ancient One who is beyond all darkness, all delusion. And knowing Him, ye also shall be saved from death." Here is the word for the sake of which all the rest exists and has existed. Here is the crowning realisation, into which all others are resolvable. When, in his lecture on "The Work Before Us," the Swami adjures all to aid him in the building of a temple wherein every worshipper in the land can worship, a temple whose shrine shall contain only the word Om, there are some of us who catch in the utterance the glimpse of a still greater temple — India herself, the Motherland, as she already exists — and see the paths, not of the Indian churches alone, but of all Humanity, converging there, at the foot of that sacred place wherein is set the symbol that is no symbol, the name that is beyond all sound. It is to this, and not away from it, that all the paths of all the worships and all the religious systems lead. India is at one with the most puritan faiths of the world in her declaration that progress is from seen to unseen, from the many to the One, from the low to the high, from the form to the formless, and never in the reverse direction. She differs only in having a word of sympathy and promise for every sincere conviction, wherever and whatever it may be, as constituting a step in the great ascent. The Swami Vivekananda would have been less than he was, had anything in this Evangel of Hinduism been his own. Like the Krishna of the Gitâ, like Buddha, like Shankarâchârya, like every great teacher that Indian thought has known, his sentences are laden with quotations from the Vedas and Upanishads. He stands merely as the Revealer, the Interpreter to India of the treasures that she herself possesses in herself. The truths he preaches would have been as true, had he never been born. Nay more, they would have been equally authentic. The difference would have lain in their difficulty of access, in their want of modern clearness and incisiveness of statement, and in their loss of mutual coherence and unity. Had he not lived, texts that today will carry the bread of life to thousands might have remained the obscure disputes of scholars. He taught with authority, and not as one of the Pandits. For he himself had plunged to the depths of the realisation which he preached, and he came back like Ramanuja only to tell its secrets to the pariah, the outcast, and the foreigner. And yet this statement that his teaching holds nothing new is not absolutely true. It must never be forgotten that it was the Swami Vivekananda who, while proclaiming the sovereignty of the Advaita Philosophy, as including that experience in which all is one, without a second, also added to Hinduism the doctrine that Dvaita, Vishishtâdvaita, and Advaita are but three phases or stages in a single development, of which the last-named constitutes the goal. This is part and parcel of the still greater and more simple doctrine that the many and the One are the same Reality, perceived by the mind at different times and in different attitudes; or as Sri Ramakrishna expressed the same thing, "God is both with form and without form. And He is that which includes both form and formlessness." It is this which adds its crowning significance to our Master's life, for here he becomes the meeting-point, not only of East and West, but also of past and future. If the many and the One be indeed the same Reality, then it is not all modes of worship alone, but equally all modes of work, all modes of struggle, all modes of creation, which are paths of realisation. No distinction, henceforth, between sacred and secular. To labour is to pray. To conquer is to renounce. Life is itself religion. To have and to hold is as stern a trust as to quit and to avoid. This is the realisation which makes Vivekananda the great preacher of Karma, not as divorced from, but as expressing Jnâna and Bhakti. To him, the workshop, the study, the farmyard, and the field are as true and fit scenes for the meeting of God with man as the cell of the monk or the door of the temple. To him, there is no difference between service of man and worship of God, between manliness and faith, between true righteousness and spirituality. All his words, from one point of view, read as a commentary upon this central conviction. "Art, science, and religion", he said once, "are but three different ways of expressing a single truth. But in order to understand this we must have the theory of Advaita." The formative influence that went to the determining of his vision may perhaps be regarded as threefold. There was, first, his literary education, in Sanskrit and English. The contrast between the two worlds thus opened to him carried with it a strong impression of that particular experience which formed the theme of the Indian sacred books. It was evident that this, if true at all, had not been stumbled upon by Indian sages, as by some others, in a kind of accident. Rather was it the subject-matter of a science, the object of a logical analysis that shrank from no sacrifice which the pursuit of truth demanded. In his Master, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, living and teaching in the temple-garden at Dakshineshwar, the Swami Vivekananda — "Naren" as he then was — found that verification of the ancient texts which his heart and his reason had demanded. Here was the reality which the books only brokenly described. Here was one to whom Samâdhi was a constant mode of knowledge. Every hour saw the swing of the mind from the many to the One. Every moment heard the utterance of wisdom gathered superconsciously. Everyone about him caught the vision of the divine. Upon the disciple came the desire for supreme knowledge "as if it had been a fever". Yet he who was thus the living embodiment of the books was so unconsciously, for he had read none of them! In his Guru, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa, Vivekananda found the key to life. Even now, however, the preparation for his own task was not complete. He had yet to wander throughout the length and breadth of India, from the Himalayas to Cape Comorin, mixing with saints and scholars and simple souls alike, learning from all, teaching to all, and living with all, seeing India as she was and is, and so grasping in its comprehensiveness that vast whole, of which his Master's life and personality had been a brief and intense epitome. These, then — the Shâstras, the Guru, and the Motherland — are the three notes that mingle themselves to form the music of the works of Vivekananda. These are the treasure which it is his to offer. These furnish him with the ingredients whereof he compounds the world's heal-all of his spiritual bounty. These are the three lights burning within that single lamp which India by his hand lighted and set up, for the guidance of her own children and of the world in the few years of work between September 19, 1893 and July 4, 1902. And some of us there are, who, for the sake of that lighting, and of this record that he has left behind him, bless the land that bore him and the hands of those who sent him forth, and believe that not even yet has it been given to us to understand the vastness and significance of the message that he spoke. January 16 Everything happens for a reason. I lost my job yesterday. Mixed feelings really. Part of me really wanted to do something I liked. This job was never IT. I was wasting my time, my PhD, the hard, intellectually stimulating work I put in for 6 long years. This job did not require a PhD, or perhaps even a masters degree. Yeah, most people are not all about degrees. Sadly, I am. Not that I judge people without one differently. But I know I am a stronger, smarter person because of my degrees - - that exposed me to an unknown world, however niche. There is a certain way you think after a terminal degree, something that a MBA or an MA may never give you. And although those 4-6 years were the hardest in my life so far, (I hated those times, never want to re-live them), I am happy I was able to endure. Then, what was I still doing at my now-ex job?Quantitative surveys from survey monkey, a little-bit-of dabbling with that industry, boring database entries, well - nothing significant. There were a few challenging moments, I do admit - but mainly busy, brain-dead work. And times where certain comments and certain issues made me doubt my own abilities, for instance - my writing skills, my grammar and my confidence. It was time to step up and get out. But even after 15 months I did not leave. Well, I know why I was still there. It was the paycheck, and it was my visa issue. Now that I have been kicked out, I can look at this so much more objectively. Yes, it has only been a day, but a good night's sleep and strong support from my family - - and my thinking is crystal clear. Its incredible how we end up in jobs we would rather not do. And its incredible, the kind of freedom we feel when we finally manage to get out of them. I am happy. I feel free. I feel alive. Everything happens for a reason. Yes, there will be no paycheck. And yes, I may have to be dependent on my husband now. But that's only for a little while. Until I figure out the next adventure. My new gig. Definitely something more intellectually stimulating, and a place more accepting of new ideas and different cultures. Where my accent may not give away my 'bad grammar'. Perhaps academia. Cheers to a new me. January 13 You know you grew up in India in the 90's when...This list is courtesy, Ankur Jain. I couldnt resist. This was fantastic :)
1) You know the words to 'In-pin-safety-pin' and 'akkad-bakkad' by heart
2) Cricket is almost a religion for you, and you idolize at least one of Kapil Dev/Rahul Dravid/Sachin Tendulkar/Saurav Ganguly 3) You have read at least some Chacha Chaudhary or Tinkle comics 4) You've watched Shaktimaan on TV at least once in your life. And you can immediately recognize the character when you see him. 5) You have some 'NRI' relatives. 6) You couldn't wait for it to be December so you could have the Toblerone chocolates your NRI relatives brought you 7) You watched Cartoon Network, and then the late night movies on TNT that came after Cartoon Network ended. 8) You watched corny dubbed versions of Small Wonder, Silver Spoon, and I Dream of Jeanie 9) You were THRILLED when McDonald's opened in your neighborhood (or even eight kilometers away) 10) Your first burgers were at Wimpy's or Nirula's. 11) A visit to Pizza Hut used to mean a special treat 12) You have seen Kuch Kuch Hota Hai and Hum Aapke Hain Kaun at least 5 times each 13) You still remember the theme song to Hum Paanch. 14) You have played hours upon hour of Pukdam-pakdai, oonch-neech, kho-kho, 'Doctor, doctor, help us!', 'Lock and key' 15) You have played 'Uma Joshi' more times than you can remember. 16) Dog 'in' the bone was your favorite co-ed game. 17) Much of your free time in school was spent playing UNO. 18) You collected trump cards of wrestlers, cricketers, and airplanes, and did not quite understand why your younger siblings were obsessed with Pokemon and the other Japanese trends that followed. 19) Your summer vacations were often synonymous with visiting your grandparents 20) Your parents, at some point, told you 'Dark Room' was a bad game to play. But you still loved playing it. 21) Bole mere lips, I love uncle Chips! 22) You know the song 'Made in India' by Alisha Chinoi 23) You have seen many many many episodes of 'Antakshri' on Zee TV and know the only thing constant in the show is Anu Kapoor. 24) Amy evenings have been spent watching little kids gyrate vulgarly on Boogie Woogie on Sony. 25) You were the coolest thing in class if you had a computer in your house while it was still the 90s. 26) You learnt LOGO in school! 27) You couldn't wait to start 4th/6th standard so you could start writing with PENS instead of with pencils! 28) You often you terms and phrases like 'kutti', 'abba', 'same to you, back to you, with no returns', and 'shame shame, puppy shame, all the donkeys know your name.' 29) You most probably saw Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge at the cinema at least once. You also fantasized singing songs in mustard fields like in the movie. 30) You have seen David Dhawan and Govinda movies and laughed at them. 31) You have said 'haw' or 'haw ji ki pwji' when you saw people kissing in English movies 31) You have seen Titanic at least 12 times. 32) You thought seeing English movies and speaking English made you the coolest thing ever. 33) You remember the Orissa cyclone, even though you didn't know what a cyclone was. 34) You remember the Gujarat earthquake very clearly and could possibly tell everyone EXACTLY what you were ding when the earthquake occurred. 35) Barbies for girls, and GI Joes for boys were the ultimate status symbols. You just wanted more more more and more. And how can I forget Hot Wheels, for both boys and girls? I personally have a collection of over 200 little Hot Wheels cars. 36) You have worn Osh-Kosh B'gosh and United Colours of Benetton clothes while growing up. And you thought 'imported' clothes were definitely way better than 'made in India' clothes (never mind that a lot of clothes brought from overseas by NRI relatives were actually made in India, before 'Made in China' started appearing on EVERY existing thing) 37) You know the words to 'Posham Paa', and like it better than 'Oranges and Lemons' even though you'd sing the latter to sound cool (see 32 above). 38) At some point or other, cool was your favourite, and therefore, most overused word. 39) Captain Planet was your first introduction to environmental consciousness. 40) You have tried to convince people around you to not burst crackers on Diwali, and then gone straight back home and burst them yourself. 41) You have had endless packets of Parle Gluco G biscuits, and of Brittania Little Hearts biscuits. 42) You loved licking off the cream from the centre of Bourbon biscuits. 43) There were no Nike, Reebok, Adidas, Puma- Bata and Liberty was the way to go for your sports shoes. 44) You have probably consumed more Frooti in your lifetime than there is oil in Iraq. 45) You watched Baywatch on Star World even though (or because) your parents said you shouldn't watch it. 46) You bought packets of potato chips for the specific purpose of collecting Tazoa. And you had Tazos depicting everyone from Confucius to Daffy Duck to Daffy Duck dressed as Confucius. 47) For the longest time, the Maruti 800, the Premier Padmini, THE Fiat, and THE Ambassador were the only cars you saw on the road, and the Contessa was cool because it was bigger. 48) You would literally jump up in excitement if you ever chanced upon an imported car (Oh my gosh, is that really a MERCEDES?)! 49) You spent a good part of 1998 drooling over the Hyundai Santro and the Daewoo Matiz , debating which one was better. 50) You used to Fuzen gum. You also chewed Big (big) Babool and/or Boom Boom Boomer chewing gum. They were bright pink and disgusting tasting, but you loved them for the temporary tattoos. 51) Talking of temporary tattoos, you sometimes had contests with your classmates about who had more tattoos on their arm, leg, knee, hand, forehead, wherever. 52) You thought Mario and Tetris were the coolest things ever invented, especially if you were a boy. 53) You knew that having the latest Hero or Atlas bicycle would make you the coolest kid on the block. 54) You can imitate Sushmita Sen's winning gasp to perfection. 55) You have, at some point of time, worn GAP clothes (real or fake) like SRK in KKHH. 56) Seemingly senseless acronyms like SRK, DDLJ, KKHH actually make sense to you. 57) You have at some point debated who was more beautiful- Aishwarya or Sushmita. 58) If you lived in Delhi, you went bowling at Essex Farms, or Go-Karting at 32nd Milestone and couldn't think how you could get any cooler than that. 59) Baskin Robbins ice-cream was THE thing to have! 60) You know what Campa Cola is. And you also knew that Coca Cola was THE drink. 61) When you would watch WWF keenly every evening/afternoon and really think that Undertaker had 7 lives and he made an "actual" appearance in the Akshay Kumar- starrer Khiladiyon ka Khiladi. 62) When all backpacks (or 'schoolbags') and water bottles and tiffin boxes had strange cartoon characters that were hybrid versions of seven or eight different characters, and you still bought them, because a green man wih a water pistol, boots, a jet-pack, Johnny bravo hair, a rajasthani mustache, gloves, and underwear (long johns) over his pants, called 'Mr. X' was OBVIOUSLY a status symbol. 63) You remember the Nirma tikia jingle. 64) You remember the Nirma girl. 65) You remember the 'doodh doodh' ad and also the 'roz khao andey' ads. 66) You grew up reading, if you read at all, some or all of Nancy Drews, Enid Blyton books, Hardy Boys, Babysitters Club, Animorphs, Goosebumps, Sweet Valley series, Judy Blumes, and Tintin, or Archie comics. Because naturally, reading foreign authors made you much cooler than reading Tinkle. 67) Towards the late 90s (1998-99) at least some of us started our Harry Potter obsessions! 68) You absolutely HAD to go to Essel World if you wnet to Mumbai! "Essel World mein rahoonga main, ghar nahin nahin jaaonga main!" 69) You watched the Bournvita Quiz contest on TV pretty religiously. The smarter ones amongst you actually took part in it and had your entire school and your entire extended families watch you on it! 70) "Jungle jungle baat chali hai, pata chala hai. Chaddi pehen ke phool khila hai, phool khila!" 71) Maggi 2 Minute Noodles = ultimate snack (and tiffin, lunch, dinner)! 72) If you grew up in the early 90s, you recall the nation's obsession with Mahabharata on TV 73) In the later 90s, you religiously followed Hip Hip Hooray on Zee. Maybe Just Mohabbat on Sony too. 74) You eagerly awaited Friendship Day, so you could give friendship bands to all your friends, and get bands from them in return. Then, of course, those with the most bands loved to show them off (and on Rakhi, boys with the most Rakhis loved showing those off too!) 75) This list made you smile. December 24 Christmas, the Bengali way....
As an anthropologist, this takes special significance. This TV story, on NDTV. It's Christmas time and Kolkata is all ready to celebrate. But, instead of regular celebrations, the festival has been turned into Bengali flavour. "We have heard of Jingle Bells and all that. But those are in English. We are Bengali, brought up in a Bengali atmosphere. So we have adapted carol singing to Bengali culture," said Robi Mondal, a Carol singer. http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/video/video.aspx?id=48527 December 22 Whose media? Which people?Article printed in the Hindu. Sent to the SCM group.
Whose media? Which people?
NISSIM MANNATHUKKAREN The coverage of the terror attacks showed that when the media becomes a purely business enterprise, news becomes a commodity, serving the interests of the few. It ceases to be the guardian of democracy or the protector of public interest. Walter Cronkite of the CBS takes off his glasses while announcing the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. He puts them back on slowly, and takes about seven seconds to read the next sentence in a voice struggling to regain its composure. Hastiness and superficiality are the psychic diseases of the 20th century, and more than anywhere else this disease is reflected in the press. Alexander Solzhenitsyn On November 22, 1963, some 38 minutes past two p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Walter Cronkite of the CBS takes off his glasses while announcing the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. He puts them back on slowly, and takes about seven seconds to read the next sentence in a voice struggling to regain its composure. Those few seconds of time, which are an eternity for live television, surely would rank among the most poignant moments of television journalism. Reams of pages could not have evoked the same pathos as those moments of silence. Contrast these with the plasticity and obscenity that characterised the 60 hours of visual media coverage of the terror in Mumbai, especially in English. As Jean Baudrillard puts it, the obscenity of media events "is no longer the traditional obscenity of what is hidden, repressed, forbidden or obscure; on the contrary, it is the obscenity of the visible, of the all-too-visible, of the more-visible-than-visible". What the terror exposed was not just the underbelly of the Indian State but also the innards of the institution of media in India. Role of commercial media But the few critical responses to the terror coverage do not go beyond the superficial and technical aspects of this phenomenon to understand the deeper question, which is the role of a commercial media in a democratic society. The real issue, therefore, is the systematic erosion of the concept of the press as the fourth estate: the belief exemplified by people like the 19th-century historian Thomas Carlyle that "invent Writing" and "Democracy is inevitable"; the belief that the press is the guardian of democracy and the protector of the public interest. And this erosion is the inevitable culmination of the long process of the appropriation of the concept of public press for the private interests of a few, in short, the turning of the press into a business enterprise. The news here becomes like any other commodity in the market. Of course, the media in India has hardly assumed the scale and the depth of corporatisation in countries like the United States. But the signs are ominous and these are hardly encouraging for the miniscule number of media outlets that seek to be a real "public press". The most problematic aspect of the recent coverage is the media's posturing as an "objective" and "neutral" entity — above all kinds of power interests — which merely seeks to bring the "truth" to the public. This posturing is seen in the shrill rhetoric of the blaming of the State and the political class for the tragedy. In this simplistic formulation of the "good" press versus the "evil" politicians, the media panders to something called the "public opinion" instead of acting as a critical catalyst of the latter. Public opinion must be the most abused term in a democracy. But what we forget in the aura of Obama is that it is public opinion that sanctioned the U.S. war in Iraq and it is public opinion that elected George Bush back to power. So a public opinion uncoupled from higher universal principles of justice and ethics is merely a mob stoning an alleged adulteress to death. Walter Cronkite went on to become the "most trusted man in America" for often going against the public opinion, even from within the confines of a commercial media. When he, against the logic of television ratings, delivered the verdict against the American war in Vietnam, President Lyndon B. Johnson famously remarked: "If I've lost Cronkite, I've lost America." With hundreds of debates on television in the last few days, it was reprehensible that not even one proposed a political solution, rather than a technical or military solution, to the problem of terrorism. A modern myth The moral superiority of the media in relation to the political class and the State is the biggest myth in any capitalist democracy. The recent politician-bashing undertaken by the media hides the deep need of both for one another. Such a synergy could not be better illustrated than by the media celebrity status attained by politicians like the late Pramod Mahajan. The same goes for the media's harmonious and mutually beneficial relationship with capitalist interests which include the entertainment industry. It is almost laughable that the media, after 60 hours of shameless voyeurism, chose to call Ramgopal Varma's visit to the Taj as "disaster tourism". The media's defence that the lack of coverage of the victims at the CST railway station as compared to those at the five-star hotels was not "because of some deliberate socio-economic prejudice" but an aberration and imbalance that crept into the chaos of covering live tragedy ignores the deeper systemic problems hinted above. Even after the tragedy was over, the sanity of the studios could still not restore the imbalance. For instance, NDTV's "We the People", telecast on November 30, had among its expert panellists, Simi Grewal, Kunal Kohli, Ratna Pathak, Ness Wadia and Luke Kenny! These people are supposed to represent us, citizens, against the inept and carnivorous State. Through the magic wand of the media, the rich and the famous transmogrify into "we the people". The philosopher Slavoj Zizek had noted that the "close door" button in the elevator is actually inoperable: it does nothing to hasten the closing of the door, but gives the impression that it does. The presumed power of the media as the representative of the people is something similar: it merely gives the illusion that we are all participating in it. And it has always been this way. That is why the suffering and tragedies of the few elites who lost their lives in the terror attack become more important than that of the other victims. That is why the media spectacle of terror has the habit of ignoring the systematic horrors and tragedies undergone by millions of Indians on a day-to-day basis. And that is why the Taj and the Oberoi will enter our wounded collective consciousness, unlike Kambalapalli and Khairlanji. It is shocking that a slogan like "enough is enough" is bandied about in the media now after a terror attack. The moral angst of the media could not be roused all these years even when 1.5 lakh farmers committed suicide in a period of mere eight years from 1997 to 2005. How many channels did exclusive "breaking news" stories when India, the second fastest growing economy in the world, secured the 94th position, behind even Nepal, in the Global Hunger Index Report? Where were the Shobha Des and Ness Wadias then, who are now out on the streets mouthing revolutionary slogans like "boycott taxes"? Where were the candle light vigils and demonstrations when policemen rode on a motorbike with a human being tied to it? Or when a father and a child were crushed under a bus after being thrown off it for not being able to pay two rupees for the ticket? For the 40 crore Indians who live like worms, the prospect of being shot dead by terrorists would seem like a dream come true. At least it is more glorious and patriotic than swallowing pesticide! POIGNANT MOMENT: Walter Cronkite announcing John F. Kennedy's Assassination. The clamour for the accountability of the State and political class that has been occasioned by the terror was long overdue. And the media has played a role in giving a stage to vent this anger. But ultimately, it hides the fact that commercial media is just another partner in the State-corporate alliance. Otherwise, how can you explain the lopsided coverage in the English media about poverty, hunger, health, nutrition and violation of human rights (which would not exceed 10 per cent of the total number of stories and reports)? While a lot of questions have been raised about democracy after the terror attack, there is none about the need for a real independent media which is free not only from the clutches of the State but also from profit and commercial considerations. Enforcing some security guidelines for the media for wartime and emergency coverage does not address the larger question of the freedom of the press and its accountability to the public which can happen only if the latter are treated as citizens and not as consumers. Blaming the media alone for our problems or not acknowledging some of the benefits of even a commercial media is naïve and one-sided. Nevertheless, the "public debates" that were staged on television in the last few days operated on a thoroughly emasculated notion of democracy and security. What the urban middle classes and the elite want is not democracy but Adam Smith's night watchman State which does nothing more than the strong and efficient protection of the life, limbs and property of the people (read the classes). Once that is accomplished, whether the masses sell their blood, kidneys or their bodies to make a living is none of their problem. Despite the clamour for democracy, even the media is aware that if real democracy is established, it will not be able to sell many of the things that it is selling now, including terror as a packaged product. Until then, it will continue to be the vulture in the Pulitzer Prize-winning photograph of photojournalist Kevin Carter: the Sudanese toddler, all skin and bones, lies slumped on the ground in her attempt to crawl to the feeding centre, while it waits in the background, for her to die. At least, Kevin Carter had the conscience to end his life. The author is Assistant Professor with Dalhousie University, Canada. Mumbai Terror AttackMom sent this site - interesting...
This sections contains views and suggestions of citizens on the Mumbai Terror Attacks of Nov. 2008. It also contains ideas from citizens for initiatives that can be undertaken to improve things. Events, volunteers available and services offered are also listed.
Forbes Traveler: was quoted here , May 2008Destination detox! India's top spas
David Hirschman, Forbes Traveler | FT | May 23, 2008 | 14:57 IST Between Delhi's crushing crowds and Mumbai's glamour and glitz -- not to mention the countless temples and castles -- there's no shortage of exotic attractions for travelers in India. But a growing number of visitors are spending less time at the Taj Mahal, and are instead seeking out the medical and spiritual benefits of traditional Ayurvedic treatment at the high-end spas popping up all over India.
Ayurveda, which literally means "knowledge of life," originated in South India more than 5,000 years ago and is considered a longevity science in the subcontinent. In simple (and possibly overly brief) terms, Ayurveda says the body consists of three main aspects: vata, pitta and kapha. These can come out of alignment due to pollution, stress, disease and even just the strain of everyday life. The goal of an Ayurvedic practitioner, then, is to rebalance to this system -- thereby bringing the subject back to his or her "true self." While the Indian government doesn't have specific figures for the number of people who come to the country specifically for Ayurveda, a recent McKinsey Report for the Confederation of Indian Industry says that medical tourism from the West could grow at an estimated 30 percent a year. (This includes visitors who come for traditional medical procedures, including surgery. Click here for Forbes Traveler's report on Medical Tourism.) According to the study, this could conceivably add $1 billion to the Indian tourism industry by 2012.
Most luxury hotels in India offer some form of Ayurvedic treatment, usually focusing on prescribed massages using essential oils -- the same types of treatments you can get in the US. But true Ayurvedic practice in India is more holistic.
"People equate Ayurveda simply with massage, but that isn't correct," says Dr Komal Shah-Kapoor, Director of Research at SpaFinder. "In the US, massage and parts of Ayurveda are taken and made into an enjoyable spa treatment, but that's a little different from the way Ayurveda takes place in India. It's not just working on one part of the body; it's working on the whole body."
Traditional Ayurvedic practitioners combine massage with medicinal herb treatments, restricted diet, meditation and yoga. "When they treat an illness, it isn't just about treating the illness," says Dr Shah-Kapoor. "They suggest nutritional guidelines and they suggest lifestyle changes. Everything that they do basically taps into natural resources and helps you to remove the cause of that illness." According to Shah-Kapoor, 80 percent of Indians follow some form of Ayurveda. Since Ayurveda originated in Southwest India, in the lush forests and swampland of what is now the state of Kerala -- the native home to the herbs and oils used in the treatment -- that's where many of the best known resorts, or shalas, are located.
The Divya Spa at the Leela Kovalam Beach Resort sits atop cliffs overlooking the Arabian Sea, and offers such treatments as Shirodhara (opening of the third eye), a process of pouring warm herbal being in a steady stream onto the forehead. Aside from the spiritual effects, the Shirodhara is said to enhance blood flow to the brain and "synchronize brain waves," resulting in improved memory, healthier hair and reduced tension.
In Calicut, the Taj Ayurveda Center offers a range of therapies that include snana, which is a bath with herbal powders that can last as long as three hours. In a dhara treatment, medicated oil, milk and buttermilk are poured on the head and body to alleviate fatigue, insomnia and a host of other ailments.
For Ashish Sanghrajka, vice president of sales and partner relations for Big Five Tourism expeditions, Ayurveda can lead to better health -- and even better looks.
"Ayurveda can be used to take wrinkles away from the face," he says, and "people have used Ayurveda to try and treat diabetes; they've used Ayurveda to try and cure cancer... It helps people to feel less stressed out, but it also helps them to feel younger. And it's not through medicine -- just through diet, and yoga and body movements, and general massages." For Sanghrajka, the key is increasing blood flow, muscle expansion and flexibility.
Indians undergoing Ayurvedic treatments will often go to resorts for two or three weeks or more, making the pilgrimage for healing and detox programs that include fixed diets, daily regiments of yoga and meditation, and medicinal spa treatments prescribed by a doctor. For more hardcore Ayurvedic practitioners (with more time to spare), centers such as the Agastya Ayurveda Garden Resort offer a 62-day circuit that starts with massages and steam treatments, then progresses to "therapeutic vomiting," enemas and sometimes even blood-letting.
For a deluxe Ayurvedic experience -- without the blood-letting -- The Coconut Lagoon in Kumarakom is a safe bet. The resort sits upon Vembanad Lake and can only be accessed via boat along Kerala's renowned backwaters. They offer a full slate of Ayurveda paired with excursions to nearby cultural attractions.
Ayurvedic practitioners generally say that the muggy summer monsoon season is the best time to undergo treatment because heavy rains are effective in taking dust out of the air and sweating is thought to be purifying. But Southern India can be brutally hot in the summer. If you're not up for the heat, one of the north's top Ayurvedic destinations is the 21,000-square-foot Ananda Spa, located in the Himalayan foothills near Rishikesh, the former home of the Maharaja of Tehri-Garhwal. Many of the spa's 79 body and beauty treatments combine Ayurvedic principles and yoga with other Western practices.
See Slideshow:�India's Top Spa Retreats Express Hospitality: was quoted here, April 2008A spa-cial future From straddling on the fringes of the luxe hospitality universe to swerving to the forefront of all segments, spas have elbowed their way to become a revenue-generating necessity. By Neeti Mehra When SpaFinder, a company dedicated to the global spa marketplace, began in 1987, spas as they are known today, were but a handful around the world. Today the scenario is different. According to SpaFinder data, there are now approximately 16,000 spas in the US alone (surpassing even Starbucks!). There is also a greater variety of spas - destination spas, resort and hotel spas, day spas, medical spas, spas on cruise ships, etc. In India too, spas have moved beyond the definition of two massage beds attached to the hotel's gym and beauty salon, to become complete branded set-ups that cater to more than the epidermis. Scratch the surface and medical tourism, alternate therapies and post-surgery recoveries are revealed. In short, we are witnessing the transformation of a spa from a source of relaxation and rejuvenation to a precursor of a healthy lifestyle. Integrating philosophies Speaking of the transition over the past two decades, Dr Komal Shah-Kapoor, director of research at SpaFinder, says, "Each country had its own healing traditions but the term 'spa' was not used globally until about four years ago. Due to the large 'baby boomer' population - a group with time to travel and disposable income - and increasing stress levels everywhere, spas have become a necessary part of life today." Amidst all this, the symbiotic relationship between spas and hotels and resorts is inescapable. Says Michel Van Der Hoeven, VP (Development) at Anantara Resort & Spa, "From an add-on pampering facility offered by hotels and resorts a few years ago, spas have now established itself as an integral part of any hotel and resort development." This holistic development is seen across brands that focus on delivering a health and wellness experience. Consider Amanresorts, which was recently acquired by Delhi-based realty major DLF. With an inventory of just over 650 rooms worldwide, this David among Goliaths has a band of elitist travellers known as Aman Junkies, who are devoted to its services. Says a company spokesperson, "We have integrated spa treatment facilities and full service spas into our ongoing resort development. We believe that small and impeccable is beautiful." In India though the luxury market was synonymous with brands such as the Taj Hotels Resorts and Palaces, The Oberoi Hotels & Resorts and the Leela Palaces & Resorts and it took a while till spas gained steam. Says Ashok Khanna, managing director of IHHR Hospitality, "Luxury leisure travel developed in India after the opening of Vilas, Ananda and Aman properties." He admits that the quality of leisure hotels and resorts before this was mediocre. Thankfully, those days have been pushed to the bottom of a hot tub. The country has shifted gears and spas are gaining momentum. This wellness euphoria isn't restricted to mainstream luxury hotel brands but is percolating to four and three-star hotels too. In fact, even The India Tourism Development Corporation (ITDC) is contemplating adding internationally-managed spas to their properties. A sign of times.
Health is wealth There is an offshoot to this spa profusion - the field of high-tech healing in the form of medical tourism. Soft versions are offered by Devaaya Ayurveda retreat in Goa that has on its plate holistic health programmes with treatments for rheumatism, arthritis, diabetes, spondylitis, asthma and neurological disorders. Packages extend from seven days to a month - a unique facet of Oriental treatments. While ayurveda best represents alternate healing, there are options galore for those who would like a taste of the mainstream. These integrate mainstream medical treatments with esoteric healing programmes. The Leela Palaces & Resorts has tied up with UK-based Globe Health Tours to offer cosmetic tours in India. The packages exclude airfare and include half-board accommodation at the Leela Kovalam Beach Resort, all hospital treatment and aftercare, transport between the hotel and hospital and ayurvedic treatments at the hotel spa. What is the future of such a holistic health programme for hotels? For promoting medical tourism, a taskforce comprising officials of the ministry of health and family welfare, the tourism ministry and experts in the medical field has been constituted. The future is slick - the market is growing and the approximate revenue of US$ 333 million generated in 2004 is expected to increase at the rate 20 per cent to touch US$ 2.2 billion by 2012. It is time to plough in the profits. The visitor profile If spas have transformed from pampering centres to holistic curative outposts, it is the visitors who have necessitated the change - a consequence of abundant experience. Says Shah-Kapoor, "The shift in spas from pampering to a focus on wellness has a powerful effect on luxury spas and resorts in South Asia, where wellness therapies and treatments have their origins." It isn't only the foreign tourist with oodles of moolah who is rushing to these havens. The domestic traveller is on the move too. Consider this: the most billionaires in the world reside in India - a whopping 36. Says Shah-Kapoor, "The Indian middle-class is also spending more on leisure and indigenous preventive healthcare as well as aesthetic enhancement." According to Van Der Hoeven, spa goers are nowadays more discerning and experienced. He points out that spas today holistically integrate lifestyle, traditional medicine and treatments. These appeal to experience seekers who are keen on treatments that leave a visible impact. Competing with spa experiences throughout the world leaves no room for a botched massage. This is where the hoteliers come in, be it spa menus, organic food, a stellar wine list or trained specialists from the best institutes. "Travellers are willing to pay top dollar for being pampered. India is no longer a cheap holiday destination and, therefore, the expectations are very high. Guests will not forgive if the resort does not provide an experience that matches the best overseas," Khanna cautions. So who should the hoteliers be wooing? Adam, it seems. Shah-Kapoor says that men are shifting the demographics of the average spa goer, who incidentally has been Eve. "With the popularity of alternative, non-Western treatments and therapies in the West (like yoga, ayurveda, Transcendental Meditation), travellers from Western countries want to experience those treatments in their country, which is good news for South and South-East Asia," she says. Moral of the story: Go local to attract global. Following this 'glocal' cue, she emphasises that resorts and hotels need to focus on needs of the international traveller. They in turn want to learn about indigenous cultures through local treatments, skincare products, etc. Cookie-cuttered Can something that imparts an experience so personal and uplifting be cuffed into a standardised product? According to experts, there is a requirement for differentiation even within a brand. Says Van Der Hoeven, "The design, appearance and concept is increasingly important as a way of differentiating between individual spas as well as spa brands," a mantra that integrates local culture with set brand parameters. This philosophy is reflected in the small yet beautiful philosophy, as seen in Amanresorts and Six Senses Resorts & Spas. Khanna agrees. "People today would prefer an individual world-class resort to large brands that try to standardise their products," he says. Nevertheless, large brands cannot exclude a spa, standardised or otherwise, from their portfolios. And if the guest doesn't come to the spa, then the spa will come to the guest. Starwood's Westin Hotels & Resorts has launched a new in-room spa programme. The accoutrements? A portable, specially-designed spa bed, spa basket, a flower, a CD containing customised relaxation music, and dark chocolate.
Asia ahoy! What does this fascination for seaweed wraps and Dead Sea Salt scrubs mean for Asia? Bubbling potential, according to experts. As Anantara Resort & Spa sets its sights on India, Van Der Hoeven avers, "There is vast potential for branded, luxury resorts for a domestic audience with a large (and increasing) and affluent middle class. We believe that there is opportunity to tap the local tourism market within a reasonable distance from some of the main metropolises." Also, affordability and a surge in tourism numbers augur well. But this surge has pitfalls too. Shah-Kapoor says that with the increase in demand of hotel rooms, tariffs too will gradually rise. Overall, Van Der Hoeven feels that the quality of many domestic resorts is still lacking as compared to other Asian markets such as Bali, Indonesia, Thailand and Maldives. At the same time, the desire for exclusive brands is encouraging. Consequently, luxury brands are lining up. "India is one of the key destinations where we aim a representation for Anantara," he emphasises. Shah-Kapoor concurs. "International brands will make their presence felt in the region over the next few years. We are already seeing the entry of players like Club Med, Starwood and Banyan Tree as well as increased investments from existing players like Kempinski," she says. The 'glocal' phenomenon is here to stay. "Resort spas such as Spice Village and Coconut Lagoon have already assumed a 'destination spa' feel in their ambience. Several Indian luxurious resorts that have spas will continue to offer unique and culture-specific treatments (yoga, ayurveda) that draw tourists," she adds. Eventually, she sees spa brands investing in real estate to create either destination spas (like Ananda) or lifestyle real estate properties. Spa brands will also associate with hotels as hotels with spas can be potentially more profitable worldwide. December 11 What Parents and Teachers can do...Outlook Magazine is carrying this story in the next issue on how the Mumbai terror attack has affected and continues to impact on, children of various age groups.
For the article, they spoke to a number of psychlogists and child psychiatrists. WHAT PARENTS AND TEACHERS CAN DO
Talk to your children openly about what has happened, but leave out the gory details. Provide lots of time for questions, and admit that you cannot answer them all.
Acknowledging their fears, and admit your own fears without overstating them Tailor the information you give your children to be age-specific. Don't tell them too much too soon. Don't be repetitive. Address the issue once, then move on. Limit media exposure. Chaperone them while they watch news events on television. Don't accuse them of heartlessness if they make light of the situation. It might be their method of coping. Recognize regressive or rebellious behaviour as a distress sign and address it. If distress lingers for more than three months, seek expert advice. Give your children a sense of calm and security. Spend time reading books with younger children. Carve out "family time." Allow children to co-sleep with you if they need to. Re-establish routine as soon as possible – including rules about behaviour. Do not convey your prejudices to your children. Terrorism is not about religion. In addition to the tragic things they see, help children identify good things, such as the heroism shown and the help rendered by scores of kind, courageous people. Encourage older teenagers to figure out ways to contribute and help. Don't hesitate to seek professional help if you feel out of your depth. Feel free to share. Human Chain for PeacePass it on...
Human Chain for Peace
For 12 Minutes at 12 Noon on 12th day of 12th Month 10th December 2008 HUMAN CHAIN FOR PEACE
Friday, December 12th 2008 from 12 noon to 12.15 pm Aftermath of the terrorist attacks in Mumbai on 26 November 2008 which lasted for three days, there have been surge of emotions and concerned discussions. It is not only time for introspection but time to take quick corrective steps. Mumbai has been witnessing wide ranging rallies expressing citizen's anger and demand for aggressive action.
In order to ensure that the large silent majority's voice is not drowned in the cacophony of demand for aggressive action, a large group of Civil Society, under the banner Mumbai for Peace, has organised a simple way to express their concerns.
The people of Mumbai, from all walks of life, of all faiths, all linguistic groups, all ages, will express their commitment to peace by coming out on the streets and holding hands in unity to form a 100 kilometres long Human Chain from 12 noon to 12.15 pm. on Friday, 12th December 2008.
The Human Chain is a simple way to depict our oneness, our resolve to tackle problems in calm and collected and non-violent manner.
A large civil society groups, including some corporate houses, professional bodies, colleges, schools, traders groups have come forward to join the Human Chain. They plan to come out of their offices, colleges, schools in solidarity and join the Human Chain in their area which will pass through the two artery roads in Mumbai covering the Island City and Western and Eastern Suburbs.
There is also an overwhelming response for the Human Chain on the website www.mumbaicitizens.com and is getting a large numbers of hits (2 every minute).
By way of Human Chain, we would pledge not to give in to terror and to those who preach war, violence, hatred and intolerance. We would undertake to keep Mumbai a city that is peaceful and united and would commit to building a world based on the principles of tolerance and peace, equality and justice.
Mumbai for Peace request educational schools, housing societies, government offices, shopkeepers and every mumbaikars, who are not close to the identified route, to form a Human Chain in their close vicinity and show their solidarity to the cause.
The human chains will start from Taj Mahal-Nariman House as well as Oberoi-Trident and will pass through CST, Cama Hospital, Mohd Ali Rd, Byculla, Dadar TT, Sion, Dharavi, Raheja Hospital Rd and will join the other Human Chain which would come there via Churchgate Station, Opera House Junction, Nana Chowk, Peddar Rd, Mahalaxmi Temple, Worli Naka, BDD Chawls, Door Darshan, Shiv Sena Bhavan, Shitla Devi Temple, St. Micael Church (Mahim) and to SV Road and from there it go will up to Dahisar.
For Detailed Information and Route, please visit our website: www.mumbaicitizens..com
This mail is being sent to you in order to enable other members of society having similar inclinations to participate in the event. It is hoped that you would forward this to people you know and also participate whole heartedly. If you feel that you can have a chain formed in close vicinity to your home or place of work which is not close to the route, you may form your limited chain locally. This is especially for schools where disruption from classes must be kept to a minimum and more important, to keep children safe from traffic hazards. Hold Hands for Unity Join the "Human Chain" in Mumbai ! SAY NO TO TERROR AND WAR ! SAY NO TO VIOLENCE ! Contact: Dolphy D'Souza: 9820226227, Jatin Desai: 9322255812, Varsha Rajan Berry: 9820603704, Fr. Allwyn: 9820068257, Lena Ganesh: 9821211661, Soheb Lokhandwala: 9833627173, Varsha V.V: 9869289453, Raju Bhise: 9960464430, Muhammadali Patel: 9820568641, Datta Iswalkar: 9224197954 Terror: The Aftermath - By Anand PatwardhanHave already heard criticism against this article. However, Patwardhan has his view points - - His film on Babri Mazjid was influential. My point is to upload whatever's out there, whether I agree with it or not. Let you, the reader decide.
The attack on Mumbai is over. After the numbing sorrow comes the blame game and the solutions. Loud voices amplified by saturation TV: Why don't we amend our Constitution to create new anti-terror laws? Why don't we arm our police with AK 47s? Why don't we do what Israel did after Munich or the USA did after 9/11 and hot pursue the enemy? Solutions that will lead us further into the abyss. For terror is a self-fulfilling prophecy. It thrives on reaction, polarization, militarization and the thirst for revenge.
The External Terror
Those who invoke America need only to analyze if its actions after 9/11 increased or decreased global terror. It invaded oil-rich Iraq fully knowing that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, killing over 200,000 Iraqis citizens but allowing a cornered Bin Laden to escape from Afghanistan. It recruited global support for Islamic militancy, which began to be seen as a just resistance against American mass murder. Which begs the question of who created Bin Laden in the first place, armed the madarsas of Pakistan and rejuvenated the concept of Islamic jehad? Israel played its own role in stoking the fires of jehad. The very creation of Israel in 1948 robbed Palestinians of their land, an act that Mahatma Gandhi to his credit deplored at the time as an unjust way to redress the wrongs done to Jews during the Holocaust. What followed has been a slow and continuing attack on the Palestinian nation. At first Palestinian resistance was led by secular forces represented by Yasser Arafat but as these were successfully undermined, Islamic forces took over the mantle. The first, largely non-violent Intifada was crushed, a second more violent one replaced it and when all else failed, human bombs appeared. Thirty years ago when I first went abroad there were two countries my Indian passport forbade me to visit. One was racist South Africa. The other was Israel. We were non-aligned and stood for disarmament and world peace. Today Israel and America are our biggest military allies. Is it surprising that we are on the jehadi hit list? Israel, America and other prosperous countries can to an extent protect themselves against the determined jehadi, but can India put an impenetrable shield over itself? Remember that when attackers are on a suicide mission, the strongest shields have crumbled. New York was laid low not with nuclear weapons but with a pair of box cutters. India is for many reasons a quintessentially soft target. Our huge population, vast landmass and coastline are impossible to protect. The rich may build new barricades. The Taj and the Oberoi can be made safer. So can our airports and planes. Can our railway stations and trains, bus stops, busses, markets and lanes do the same? The Terror Within
The threat of terror in India does not come exclusively from the outside. Apart from being hugely populated by the poor India is also a country divided, not just between rich and poor, but by religion, caste and language. This internal divide is as potent a breeding ground for terror as jehadi camps abroad. Nor is jehad the copyright of one religion alone. It can be argued that international causes apart, India has jehadis that are fully home grown. Perhaps the earliest famous one was Nathuram Godse who acting at the behest of his mentor Vinayak Savarkar (still referred to as "Veer" or "brave" although he refused to own up to his role in the conspiracy), murdered Mahatma Gandhi for the crime of championing Muslims. Jump forward to 6th December, 1992, the day Hindu fanatics demolished the Babri Mosque setting into motion a chain of events that still wreaks havoc today. From the Bombay riots of 1992 to the bomb blasts of 1993, the Gujarat pogroms of 2002 and hundreds of smaller deadly events, the last 16 years have been the bloodiest since Partition. Action has been followed by reaction in an endless cycle of escalating retribution. At the core on the Hindu side of terror are organizations that openly admire Adolph Hitler, nursing the hate of historic wrongs inflicted by Muslims. Ironically these votaries of Hitler remain friends and admirers of Israel. On the Muslim side of terror are scores of disaffected youth, many of whom have seen their families tortured and killed in more recent pogroms. Christians too have fallen victim to recent Hindutva terror but as yet not formed the mechanisms for revenge. Dalits despite centuries of caste oppression, have not yet retaliated in violence although a small fraction is being drawn into an armed struggle waged by Naxalites. It is clear that no amount of spending on defense, no amount of patrolling the high seas, no amount of increasing the military and police and equipping them with the latest weaponry can end the cycle of violence or place India under a bubble of safety. Just as nuclear India did not lead to more safety, but only to a nuclear Pakistan, no amount of homeland security can save us. And inviting Israel's Mossad and America's CIA/FBI to the security table is like giving the anti-virus contract to those who spread the virus in the first place. It can only make us more of a target for the next determined jehadi attack. Policing, Justice and the Media As for draconian anti-terror laws, they too only breed terror as for the most part they are implemented by a State machinery that has imbibed majoritarian values. So in Modi's Gujarat after the ethnic cleansing of Muslims in 2002, despite scores of confessions to rape and murder captured on hidden camera, virtually no Hindu extremists were punished while thousands of Muslims rotted in jail under draconian laws. The same happened in Bombay despite the Shiv Sena being found guilty by the Justice Shrikrishna Commission. Under pressure a few cases were finally brought to trial but all escaped with the lightest of knuckle raps. In stark contrast many Muslims accused in the 1993 bomb blasts were given death sentences. The bulk of our media, policing and judicial systems swallows the canard that Muslims are by nature violent. Removing democratic safeguards guaranteed by the Constitution can only make this worse. Every act of wrongful imprisonment and torture that then follows is likely to turn innocents into material for future terrorists to draw upon. Already the double standards are visible. While the Students Islamic Movement of India is banned, Hindutva outfits like the RSS, the VHP, the Bajrang Dal, and the Shiv Sena remain legal entities. The leader of the MNS, Raj Thackeray recently openly spread such hatred that several north Indians were killed by lynch mobs. Amongst these were the Dube brothers, doctors from Kalyan who treated the poor for a grand fee of Rs.10 per patient. Raj Thackeray like his uncle Bal before him, remains free after issuing public threats that Bombay would burn if anyone had the guts to arrest him. Modi remains free despite the pogroms of Gujarat. Congress party murderers of Sikhs in 1984 remain free. Justice in India is clearly not there for all. Increasing the powers of the police cannot solve this problem. Only honest and unbiased implementation of laws that exist, can. It is a tragedy of the highest proportions that one such honest policeman, Anti-Terrorist Squad chief Hemant Karkare, who had begun to unravel the thread of Hindutva terror was himself gunned down, perhaps by Muslim terror. It is reported that Col. Purohit and fellow Hindutva conspirators now in judicial custody, celebrated the news of Karkare's death. Until Karkare took charge, the Malegaon bomb blasts in which Muslims were killed and the Samjhauta Express blasts in which Pakistani visitors to India were killed were being blamed on Muslims. Karkare exposed a hitherto unknown Hindutva outfit as masterminding a series of killer blasts across the country. For his pains Karkare came under vicious attack not just from militant Hindutva but from the mainstream BJP. He was under tremendous pressure to prove his patriotism. Was it this that led this senior officer to don helmet and ill-fitting bullet proof vest and rush into battle with a pistol? Or was it just his natural instinct, the same courage that had led him against all odds, to expose Hindutva terror? Whatever it was, it only underlines the fact that jehadis of all kinds are actually allies of each other. So Bin Laden served George Bush and vice-versa. So Islamic and Hindutva jehadis have served each other for years. Do they care who dies? Of the 200 people killed in the last few days by Islamic jehadis, a high number were Muslims. Many were waiting to board trains to celebrate Eid in their hometowns in UP and Bihar, when their co-religionists gunned them down. Shockingly the media has not commented on this, nor focused on the tragedy at the railway station, choosing to concentrate on tragedies that befell the well-to-do. And it is the media that is leading the charge to turn us into a war-mongering police state where we may lead lives with an illusion of safety, but with the certainty of joylessness. I am not arguing that we do not need efficient security at public places and at vulnerable sites. But real security will only come when it is accompanied by real justice, when the principles of democracy are implemented in every part of the country, when the legitimate grievances of people are not crushed, when the arms race is replaced by a race for decency and humanity, when our children grow up in an atmosphere where religious faith is put to the test of reason. Until such time we will remain at the mercy of "patriots" and zealots. Anand Patwardhan November 2008 December 02 Petition to be submitted to Prime Minister of India for Assertive ActionThis one was also forwarded to me - Just doing my bit.
Please view and endorse the enclosed page at PetitionOnline.com:
On 7th December 2008 this petition will be attempted to be presented to the Prime Minister of India. Till 7th December, endeavour is to collect at least 1 million signatures. Probably such mass need may stir the administration to take visible and needful action. Please sign and forward to as many people known to you as possible. Hotel Taj : icon of whose India ?Hotel Taj : icon of whose India ?
Gnani Sankaran- Tamil writer, Chennai.
Watching at least four English news channels surfing from one another
during the last 60 hours of terror strike made me feel a terror of another kind. The terror of assaulting one's mind and sensitivity with cameras, sound bites and non-stop blabbers. All these channels have been trying to manufacture my consent for a big lie called - Hotel Taj the icon of India. Whose India, Whose Icon ?
It is a matter of great shame that these channels simply did not
bother about the other icon that faced the first attack from terrorists - the Chatrapathi Shivaji Terminus (CST) railway station. CST is the true icon of Mumbai. It is through this railway station hundreds of Indians from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Rajasthan, West Bengal and Tamilnadu have poured into Mumbai over the years, transforming themselves into Mumbaikars and built the Mumbai of today along with the Marathis and Kolis. But the channels would not recognise this. Nor would they recognise
the thirty odd dead bodies strewn all over the platform of CST. No Barkha dutt went there to tell us who they were. But she was at Taj to show us the damaged furniture and reception lobby braving the guards. And the TV cameras did not go to the government run JJ hospital to find out who those 26 unidentified bodies were. Instead they were again invading the battered Taj to try in vain for a scoop shot of the dead bodies of the page 3 celebrities. In all probability, the unidentified bodies could be those of workers
from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh migrating to Mumbai, arriving by train at CST without cell phones and pan cards to identify them. Even after 60 hours after the CST massacre, no channel has bothered to cover in detail what transpired there. The channels conveniently failed to acknowledge that the Aam Aadmis of
India surviving in Mumbai were not affected by Taj, Oberoi and Trident closing down for a couple of weeks or months. What mattered to them was the stoppage of BEST buses and suburban trains even for one hour. But the channels were not covering that aspect of the terror attack. Such information at best merited a scroll line, while the cameras have to be dedicated for real time thriller unfolding at Taj or Nariman bhavan. The so called justification for the hype the channels built around
heritage site Taj falling down (CST is also a heritage site), is that Hotel Taj is where the rich and the powerful of India and the globe congregate. It is a symbol or icon of power of money and politics, not India. It is the icon of the financiers and swindlers of India. The Mumbai and India were built by the Aam Aadmis who passed through CST and Taj was the oasis of peace and privacy for those who wielded power over these mass of labouring classes. Leopold club and Taj were the haunts of rich spoilt kids who would drive their vehicles over sleeping Aam Aadmis on the pavement, the Mafiosi of Mumbai forever financing the glitterati of Bollywood (and also the terrorists) , Political brokers and industrialists. It is precisely because Taj is the icon of power and not people, that
the terrorists chose to strike. The terrorists have understood after several efforts that the Aam
Aadmi will never break down even if you bomb her markets and trains. He/she was resilient because that is the only way he/she can even survive. Resilience was another word that annoyed the pundits of news channels
and their patrons this time. What resilience, enough is enough, said Pranoy Roy's channel on the left side of the channel spectrum. Same sentiments were echoed by Arnab Goswami representing the right wing of the broadcast media whose time is now. Can Rajdeep be far behind in this game of one upmanship over TRPs ? They all attacked resilience this time. They wanted firm action from the government in tackling terror. The same channels celebrated resilience when bombs went off in trains
and markets killing and maiming the Aam Aadmis. The resilience of the ordinary worker suited the rich business class of Mumbai since work or manufacture or film shooting did not stop. When it came to them, the rich shamelessly exhibited their lack of nerves and refused to be resilient themselves. They cry for government intervention now to protect their private spas and swimming pools and bars and restaurants, similar to the way in which Citibank, General Motors and the ilk cry for government money when their coffers are emptied by their own ideologies. The terrorists have learnt that the ordinary Indian is unperturbed by
terror. For one whose daily existence itself is a terror of government sponsored inflation and market sponsored exclusion, pain is something he has learnt to live with. The rich of Mumbai and India Inc are facing the pain for the first time and learning about it just as the middle classes of India learnt about violation of human rights only during emergency, a cool 28 years after independence. And human rights were another favourite issue for the channels to whip
at times of terrorism. Arnab Goswami in an animated voice wondered where were those
champions of human rights now, not to be seen applauding the brave and selfless police officers who gave up their life in fighting terorism. Well, the counter question would be where were you when such officers were violating the human rights of Aam Aadmis. Has there ever been any 24 hour non stop coverage of violence against dalits and adivasis of this country? This definitely was not the time to manufacture consent for the extra
legal and third degree methods of interrogation of police and army but Arnabs don't miss a single opportunity to serve their class masters, this time the jingoistic patriotism came in handy to whitewash the entire uniformed services. The sacrifice of the commandos or the police officers who went down
dying at the hands of ruthless terrorists is no doubt heart rending but in vain in a situation which needed not just bran but also brain. Israel has a point when it says the operations were misplanned resulting in the death of its nationals here. Khakares and Salaskars would not be dead if they did not commit the
mistake of traveling by the same vehicle. It is a basic lesson in management that the top brass should never t ravel together in crisis. The terrorists, if only they had watched the channels, would have laughed their hearts out when the Chief of the Marine commandos, an elite force, masking his face so unprofessionally in a see-through cloth, told the media that the commandos had no idea about the structure of the Hotel Taj which they were trying to liberate. But the terrorists knew the place thoroughly, he acknowledged. Is it so difficult to obtain a ground plan of Hotel Taj and discuss
operation strategy thoroughly for at least one hour before entering? This is something even an event manager would first ask for, if he had to fix 25 audio systems and 50 CCtvs for a cultural event in a hotel. Would not Ratan Tata have provided a plan of his ancestral hotel to the commandos within one hour considering the mighty apparatus at his and government's disposal? Are satelite pictures only available for terrorists and not the government agencies ? In an operation known to consume time, one more hour for preparation would have only improved the efficiency of execution. Sacrifices become doubly tragic in unprofessional circumstances. But
the Aam Aadmis always believe that terror-shooters do better planning than terrorists. And the gullible media in a jingoistic mood would not raise any question about any of these issues. They after all have their favourite whipping boy - the politician the
eternal entertainer for the non-voting rich classes of India. Arnabs and Rajdeeps would wax eloquent on Nanmohan Singh and Advani
visiting Mumbai separately and not together showing solidarity even at this hour of national crisis. What a farce? Why can't these channels pool together all their camera crew and reporters at this time of national calamity and share the sound and visual bites which could mean a wider and deeper coverage of events with such a huge human resource to command? Why should Arnab and Rajdeep and Barkha keep harping every five minutes that this piece of information was exclusive to their channel, at the time of such a national crisis? Is this the time to promote the channel? If that is valid, the politician promoting his own political constituency is equally valid. And the duty of the politican is to do politics, his politics. It is for the people to evaluate that politics. And terrorism is not above politics. It is politics by other means.
To come to grips with it and to eventually eliminate it, the practice
of politics by proper means needs constant fine tuning and improvement. Decrying all politics and politicians, only helps terrorists and dictators who are the two sides of the same coin. And the rich and powerful always prefer terrorists and dictators to do business with. Those caught in this crossfire are always the Aam Aadmis whose deaths
are not even mourned - the taxi driver who lost the entire family at CST firing, the numerous waiters and stewards who lost their lives working in Taj for a monthly salary that would be one time bill for their masters. Postscript: In a fit of anger and depression, I sent a message to all the channels, 30 hours through the coverage. After all they have been constantly asking the viewers to message them for anything and everything. My message read: I send this with lots of pain. All channels, including yours, must apologise for not covering the victims of CST massacre, the real mumbaikars and aam aadmis of India. Your obsession with five star elite is disgusting. Learn from the print media please. No channel bothered. Only srinivasan Jain replied: you are right. We are trying to redress balance today. Well, nothing happened till the time of writing this 66 hours after the terror attack. ’India has the right to go after terrorists’REDIFF INDIA ABROAD
’India has the right to go after terrorists’
Aziz Haniffa in Washington, DC | December 02, 2008 01:48 IST
President-elect Barack Obama has said that India has the sovereign right to go after the terrorists, who perpetrated the deadly terrorist attacks in Mumbai.
At a press conference that followed his rolling out his national security team, Obama, when reminded that during the campaign he had said if there was irrefutable evidence of Al Qaeda leaders and training camps in Pakistan he would go after them with or without Pakistan’s permission and asked if India has that same right, replied, "Sovereign nations obviously have a right to protect themselves."
"Beyond that, I don’t want to comment on the specific situation that is taking place in South Asia right now," he said, adding, "I think it is important for us to let the investigators do their job in making a determination in terms of who was responsible for carrying out these heinous acts."
Obama said, however, that: "I can tell you, my Administration will remain steadfast in support of India’s efforts to catch the perpetrators of this terrible act and bring them to justice, and I will expect that the world community will feel the same way."
Obama in declaring that every sovereign state has a right to protect itself and hence condoning India’s right to go after the terrorists, was more direct than in his earlier answer to the first question at the press conference when he was asked if India would be justified in going after the terrorists responsible for the Mumbai attack, which New Delhi has said were linked to Pakistan.
He was more circumspect when he said that, "First of all, I think it’s important to reiterate that our condolences, our thoughts and prayers go out to the people of India, the families that have been affected and obviously we are heartbroken at the deaths of the six Americans that were caught up in this tragedy."
Obama said, "I have spoken to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and expressed these concerns to him; an investigation is taking place."
"I was briefed by Secretary (Condoleezza) Rice throughout the weekend, (and) she’s on her way to the region. We’ve sent FBI to help on the investigation and this is one of those times, where I have to reiterate -- there’s one President at a time."
Obama said, "We are going to be engaged in some very delicate diplomacy in the next several days and weeks, (and) so I think it would be inappropriate for me to comment." "But, what I can say unequivocally is that both myself and the team that stands besides me, are absolutely committed to eliminating the threat of terrorism and that is true wherever it is found," he said.
"We cannot have -- we cannot tolerate -- a world in which innocents are being killed by extremists based on twisted ideologies, and we are going to have to bring the full force of our power, not only military, but also diplomatic, economic, and political to deal with these threats, not only to keep America safe, but also to ensure that peace and prosperity can exist around the world."
Obama said, he would be "monitoring the situation closely. Thus far, I think the Administration has done what’s needed in trying to get the details of the situation and my expectation is that President (Asif) Zardari of Pakistan -- who has already said that he will fully cooperate with the investigation -- will follow through with that commitment."
In his opening remarks in introducing his security team, Obama said that "as we have learned so painfully on 9/11, terror cannot be contained by borders, nor safety provided by oceans alone."
"Last week," he recalled, "we were reminded of this threat once again when terrorists took the lives of six Americans among nearly 200 victims in Mumbai."
He asserted that "in the world we seek, there is no place for those who kill innocent civilians to advance hateful extremism."
"This weekend, I told Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that Americans stand with the people of India in this dark time. And, I am confident that India’s great democracy is more resilient than killers who would tear it down."
Obama said that he was "confident that this is the team we need to make a new beginning for American national security," and noted that "this morning, we met to discuss the situation in Mumbai and some of the challenges that we face in the months and years ahead."
___________________________________________________________
See also:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India_has_right_to_protect_itself_Obama/articleshow/3781630.cms TIMES OF INDIA "India has right to protect itself: Obama" 1 Dec 2008, 2305 hrs IST, Chidanand Rajghatta, TNN symbolic act of self immolation at GatewayGot another email today where Mumbaikars will burn their own photo to show the terrorists and politicians that they are ready to die for South Mumbai. Not sure about this - I dont want to die -- and I dont want anyone else to die either. But I am all for all voices to be heard....so here's this one:
Dear friends and Mumbaikars:
Enough is enough. We have the been the victim of the vermin politicians and terrorists for too long. It is time to act. Act act act. We will not the take this lying down or standing up. On Wednesday please gather at the Gateway of India at 6 pm sharp in the evening. Everyone must get a passport photo (if not passport any other will also do). At 5.57pm, after singing the national anthem, we will burn the photo in a symbolic act of self immolation to show the terrorists and the vermin politicians that we are ready to die for south Mumbai.
Please note the timing, venue and requirements:
Wednesday 6 pm passport photo box of Ship matches Delhi's Three Fatal Flaws*Delhi's Three Fatal Flaws*
New Delhi suffers from bad PR and weak institutions. But just expressing more regret is not going to cut it.
*Sumit Ganguly*
NEWSWEEK From the magazine issue dated Dec 8, 2008 Last week's tragedy in Mumbai may have finally focused world attention on India's terror problem, but the crisis is nothing new. Yet despite the enormous death
toll---since 2004, nearly 4,000 people have been killed in India by terrorist violence--- and the huge economic and political costs of all the recent attacks, India's government has so far displayed a remarkable sang-froid on the issue. Apart from expressing its sympathy for the victims and promising to prosecute those responsible, it has failed to forge a coherent strategy to curb the menace. New Delhi's ineptitude has been evident in three key areas. First, Indian authorities have failed to convince the world that their country is a major victim of terror---despite statistics showing that it ranks second only to Iraq in terms of casualties. Second, they haven't made the institutional and organizational changes necessary or expended enough resources to tackle the problem on a war footing. And finally, India's government has (at least until recently) remained in denial about the fact that the terror problem has shifted, become at least partially homegrown. Start with India's most glaring failure: its singular inability to convince the international community that it suffers from a serious terror problem. Not all the attacks over the years have been foreign-linked. But many, especially in Punjab and in Kashmir, have---and the culprit has been Pakistan. Yet New Delhi has never made an
adequate case proving Islamabad's involvement to outsiders, relying instead on crude rhetoric that's convinced no one. Even now, in the wake of the Mumbai attacks, Indian leaders haven't shed much light on the copious circumstantial evidence tying the marauders to India's great nemesis. As a result, Pakistan's major supporters, especially the United States (and, to a lesser extent, the United Kingdom), have never brought sufficient pressure to bear on Islamabad to cut off its backing of armed radicals in India. New Delhi's PR failure is tied to its institutional one. The country's two main intelligence agencies, the external-oriented Research and Analysis Wing and the domestic-focused Intelligence Bureau (IB), have long been at odds. As a result, critical information on various terrorist groups has not been shared in a routine, seamless and timely fashion. Worse still, the IB has been chronically short of operatives for years, thanks to its failure to recruit aggressively or offer suitable professional incentives to staff. It has thus been hamstrung in trying to carry out its duties. In the aftermath of a series of bomb blasts in New Delhi in September, the government did discuss creating a new national agency devoted to tackling terrorism. But little effort was made to realize this goal, thanks to bureaucratic sluggishness and the government's preoccupation with other matters. One consequence of these failures is that Indian policymakers have been forced to work in the dark, deprived of timely threat warnings and other intelligence. Similarly, India's police forces have again and again been caught flat-footed by attacks, since they were not suitably alerted in advance. Even when crises do hit, response time has remained
terribly slow. During the Mumbai attacks, for example, it took India's elite National Security Guards a full nine hours to make it to the city. The last problem is that India has been extremely reluctant to come to terms with the fact that at least some of its terror problem is now homegrown. New
Delhi has long trumpeted the claim that the country's approximately 140 million Muslims are immune to the call of jihad. There are two reasons for this insistence. At one level, India's policymakers haven't wanted to accept that, despite plenty of evidence to the contrary, Indian Muslims face substantial discrimination in many facets of everyday life. To cite but one example, Muslims constitute about 13 percent of the population but only about 3 percent of the elite Indian administrative service. Unsurprisingly, their second-class treatment has led some Muslims to lose faith in India's democratic institutions and to violently turn against the state. Yet India's current leaders have been slow to recognize this fact as well---or at least to acknowledge it out loud, for fear of alienating critical Muslim voters. All this needs to change. In scale, brazenness and viciousness, the Mumbai attacks represented something new for India. As the fires cool, government
expressions of sympathy for the victims and promises to prosecute those involved aren't going to cut it. Indian authorities need to move with dispatch on multiple fronts: improving intelligence collection, bolstering metropolitan policing and fashioning new policies designed to address the genuine grievances of the Muslim community. Failure will only invite more attacks from those who wish to tear the country apart. Ganguly is the director of research at the Center on American and Global Security at Indiana University in Bloomington and an adjunct senior fellow at the Pacific Council on International Policy in Los Angeles./ November 30 Reactions.. She has always been one of my favorite authors - - She comes up with a fresh perspective, perhaps an emotional response - - but timely and fair. Her 'Enough-is-Enough slogan struck a chord - - she's updated her blog since then. Here's her latest update, and a link to the blog to the end.
Mumbai Meri Hai
Every Mumbaikar needs to make Usha Uthup’s unforgettable , jaunty number, “Mumbai Meri Hai…” into a personal anthem to reclaim the city we all love…. and which has been appropriated by people who clearly have zero stakes in it. People who call themselves our leaders, who now strut around ‘sanitised’ areas, with their security personnel, mouthing platitudes…. and worse insults, that wound the citizenry with the callousness of their content. Shivraj Patil has finally been shamed into resigning. But what about the other local Patil, R.R., whose shockingly insensitive remark ( “ bade, bade shahron mein aise hadse hote rehte hai…”) incensed so many shell-shocked Mumbaikars, that tv channels were requested to kill that clip by his staffers, afraid of violent reactions to his ‘casual’ comment. Almost immediately mass smes started flying across the city, demanding Patil’s head and pointing out how he should have reserved the zeal expended on chasing the city’s bar girls out, for chasing terrorists who caused such unprecedented devastation that took so many lives. Going by the magnitude of the ‘aam janata’s’ response to the heartless handling of the crisis by our netas in New Delhi, why stop with Shivraj Patil? Why not hold Manmohan Singh equally responsible? After all, moral responsibility starts at the top. The chief must take the rap first before looking for scapegoats. For the very first time, the people of Mumbai have united as one, and have woken up to the fact that together we stand, divided we fall. I was saddened by the attitude of various foreign journalists from across the world who called to ask, “ You mean there is no sectarian violence in Mumbai so far?? Communal riots have not broken out?” They sounded disappointed! Such is the perversity we are dealing with. And to all those Mumbaikars holding candle light marches, meeting at the Gateway of India, or urging people to wear black, I want to say these sweet and simple acts of solidarity, may bring some solace to our troubled minds, but they remain symbolic and somewhat hollow. What we need to safeguard ourselves and secure the city, must go beyond holding hands and lighting diyas. We must plan ahead, with specific ,achievable and enforceable targets coupled with accountability\ penalty clauses. Get the best brains on board – import them if necessary. Increase police-spend substantially. Train all those whose jobs involve protecting citizens ( firemen included), and have an aggressive attitude while dealing with terrorists. Revisit old, antiquated laws. Provide more autonomy to those on the job. Show no mercy. Show some teeth. Some of the most influential, powerful and affluent people in India reside in Mumbai. Specifically, in South Mumbai. They must emerge from their cocoons and lead from the front without any political interventions whatsoever. But will they?? Can they afford to? Will personal business interests dominate all other considerations? Too many self-serving voices have been heard. The worst being those of P.R. agents peddling stories to the celeb-hungry media on behalf of their clients – unheard of tv starlets, botoxed socialites and other urban horrors we really don’t give a damn about. Ban them Blank out these cheap publicity-seekers. And do the same with politicians in search of soundbytes and photo ops. So many vital questions remain unanswered. Who will respond to our legitimate queries, given that so many politicos are busy preening for the cameras themselves, instead of staying in the war room, planning how best to regroup and strategise, now that various clues are being pieced together. With all due respect to the dead – the heroes who laid down their lives in the line of duty – there was a singular lack of professionalism in the fact that three top cops (one in mufti) got into the Qualis together when they were aware terrorists were on the prowl. The cops became sitting ducks. I was at the Taj, a mere hour and a half before the blood bath began, and was surprised to notice that after months of very stringent security measures ( sniffer dogs, metal detectors, sensors,barricades, rerouting of cars, no access but the central one) being in place, almost all of them had been removed virtually overnight, with the side and back entrances left unmanned and open. Under whose instructions was this decision taken? Ditto for security at the CST, which had seen a formidable, fortress-like situation with sand bagged enclosures and heavily armed personnel …. till last week. Why were they withdrawn? Even to this day, nobody is sure exactly how many terrorists arrived in the city, or even how many may have been present earlier, master minding operations. The grand, old Taj could not provide the Marcos with a map of the premises – they were sent in cold – while the terrorists possessed a detailed floor plan all along. Nobody has assured Mumbaikars so far, that there are no escapees who may have slipped out as tourists\guests from the two hotels during the rescue operations. There was also a spectacular lack of co- ordination during the entire operation, especially during the first few crucial hours, when all the people involved seemed to be bumbling along without clear directions from one central body. We still don’t know whose orders were being followed, nor who was in command throughout. It became equally obvious that neither the city, nor the hotels have a crisis management programme in place that provides an immediate plan of action in an emergency. Look at how efficiently and swiftly the South African body guards swung into action at the Trident and saved so many lives. There was discipline and arduous training behind the drill they followed. Our brave men used their hearts, when minds were needed far more. The scariest aspect of the assault on Mumbai, is the chilling question – is it really and truly over? The accurate response is – yes - for now. Perhaps another sleeper cell is hard at work right at this minute, planning the next attack – warnings of which we shall ignore once again, as we did this one, too. Those demons are ten steps ahead of us. They came from the sea. Next time, they may strike us from the air. Their targets could be the RBI building, the WTC, our docks and railway stations Will we be prepared? The Air Force base in Pune is but ten short minutes of flying time away. But those ten minutes are enough to flatten even the biggest city. To save ourselves, we the people of the city will have to find our own solutions. The horrific truth is, Mumbai remains naked and vulnerable even now. With evil political vultures circling it for pickings that fill their own stomachs. Shame on all of them! Saturday, November 29, 2008Wake up, Mumbai....My fingers are shaking as I key in
this piece, minutes after watching visuals of panic stricken commuters
at CST station, running helter skelter as fresh reports of terrorist
attacks near the RBI and GT Hospital send a grievously wounded Mumbai
reeling once again…. to save itself. If these horrific attacks that
have struck every Mumbaikar’s heart do not act as a serious wake up
call, nothing else can or will.The most important lesson to learn from
the carnage is that the time has come for citizens to take control of
their lives and their beloved city, for if they don’t, they will be
dead.What the past 40 hours have demonstrated unambiguously is that our
city fathers have learned nothing from past blows in our gut, or else
innocents would not have lost their lives because there was no one in
charge when the city most needed a figure, capable of leading from the
front. The chief minister showed up outside the Trident, when the
crisis was nearly over. Delhi politicians caused more of a nuisance
than anything else when the prime minister, along with Sonia Gandhi
made the mandatory hospital visits….. diverted traffic and police
attention.
But it took a Narendra Modi to show us what political opportunism is all about when he arrogantly arrived here with bags of money to distribute to the families of Mumbai’s real heroes – the slain policemen, and wasted no time in capitalizing on the tragedy to cold bloodedly push his own agenda. There were several shocking failures and lapses…. But what good is a post- mortem, after the damage is done? What good, delayed responses – we could have, we should have, why didn’t so-and-so do this or that? The truth is, we effed up. Each and every one of us. Let us not point fingers and play the blame game, for it is dangerous and unproductive. We were caught off guard – once again. This time there is no excuse. How many attacks is it going to take for Mumbai to act and save itself?And where should we begin?? I would say let us start from taking a few key lessons from America, post 9\11. The entire country acted as one. Political differences were set aside and a superbly strategized counter-terrorism plan put into place.There have been no further attacks since then. Next, we need to pay attention to the immediate requirements of our over- burdened police force – those poor constables armed with nothing more lethal than laathis can ‘t chase a rabid dog, forget about taking on hard core, armed terrorists.Give them equipment, training and autonomy to act in such an emergency without waiting for bureaucratic clearances, then see the difference. We need an action plan to deal with crises. Citizens need to be taken into confidence with a disaster management strategy, and regular drills to keep people alert. What became evident( and cost countless lives) was the absence of leadership. With whom did the buck stop? Who was in charge of taking key and timely decisions? Was there anyone at all who was monitoring and co ordinating collective efforts to deal with each ghastly development? Individual stories of heroism are not enough in such situations – they create martyrs, nothing else. We lost outstanding officers, who misread the threat to their own lives and were not adequately protected. Our police lack basic gear – helmets, bullet proof jackets, riot shields. We expect them to protect us while they themselves are unprotected. Lack of funds is a poor excuse. Take a look at any minor politico moving around with a convoy of police cars, security personnel, ambulances. These privileges must be instantly withdrawn and reserved exclusively for top ranking politicians alone. Help in the form of crack commando units, the Marcos, NSG and the Army, arrived several hours after Operation Mumbai was underway. Naval helicopters were deployed still later. Securing a city like Mumbai is not an easy job. But it is possible . Something simple like neighbourhood sirens to alert citizens of an impending attack, are not that difficult to install. This IS war – make no mistake about that. Mumbai is hemorraging….. bleeding a slow death Political tourniquets can’t save us. If we have to save ourselves, we need to perform radical surgery…. amputate a few gangrenous limbs. And rely on the mighty heart of this great metropolis – the extraordinary people of Mumbai. But this time I am not going to be a sentimental fool and say, ‘Salaam Mumbai’. It’s time to shout, to holler, “Wake up Mumbai. Fight back. Fight back. Fight back!” Friday, November 28, 2008Enough is enoughI went out into the broad and
empty streets of this, one of the most crowded cities of the world,
earlier this evening. It was an eerie experience - something vital had
changed. It was almost as if fatigued, disheartened Mumbaikars had
given up the fight..... fed up of watching the ghastly, macabre show of
a city crumbling under the worst terrorist attack after 9\11. There
wasn't a cop in sight all along Marine Drive, Mumbai's beautiful
promenade, till my car reached the State Guest House on Malabar Hill.
Two of my children, who were with me, commented it was scarey and
strange that most areas of South Mumbai were unprotected , even as
terror continued to reign a few kilometres away. Yes, it was indeed
very strange ..... for we, the citizens, have the right to expect some
level of security, given the extraordinary circumstances that had
dominated our existence over the past 48 hours of non-stop violence. Of
course, our police force is under tremendous pressure, and God knows
the cops have done a commendable job, armed with nothing more lethal
than lathis. Even so...
Elsewhere in Mumbai, life had resumed its 'normal' pace. People in the untouched suburbs were out shopping, drinking, partying, clubbing, even celebrating.... as if nothing had happened.It baffled me initially... till I realised how childishly I was judging my own people. Should they have stopped living? Stayed glumly at home mumbling , "Oh my God! Oh my God!" Should anyone? Does that make them insensitive pigs? No. Not really. It is called the cycle of life. And death. Less than ten kilometres away, the battle was still raging..... The Taj was still burning.... and funeral pyres of those who had died in the blood bath, were being lit by sons, fathers, brothers and uncles. With a start and a shock like no other, I discovered I knew at least ten of those people being cremated tonight, even as I drove along grimly, wondering - 'what next? what now? Is the worst over??' 'Enough is enough' is now more than my 'quotable quote', more than a mantra.... it needs to become a movement and take every right thinking citizen along... Cry, my beloved cityPlease don’t utter another word about the ‘Spirit of Mumbai’. Or how it is ‘Business as usual’, because the time to be philosophical/stoical about our shattered lives is over. Initial numbness has been replaced by rage and sorrow. Those policemen did not have to die. Those innocents need not have been killed. Mumbai’s abject humiliation at the hands of a few misguided youth, is complete. And there are no answers – how? Why? Gabbar Singh’s menacing question, “Kitney aadmi the?” may never get the correct response from a cowardly and evasive administration that has once again let down the people of this megapolis .It is not about a numbers game. It is about the powerlessness that has paralysed what is considered one of the most dynamic cities in the world.Mumbai today is a city in a coma…. One it may never recover from. Dazed and desperate. As I write this, a mere half a kilometre away from both the hotels targeted by the terrorists, my heart aches, my eyes are heavy, and my throat painfully constricted. Strange how a monumental tragedy affects individuals. Our first thoughts are about the safety of our own – are those we love okay? Yes??? Thank God! Selfish emotions dominate our actions – as they did mine…. I’m ashamed to admit.My husband and I were at a sitdown dinner in another 5-Star hotel, a few miles from the Taj and Trident. This was unusual in itself…. The newly-opened Four Season’s is outside the ambit of hard -core South Mumbaiwallas like ourselves. But this was no ordinary occasion. The French Ambassador was hosting an evening for Nadir Godrej who had recently received a French civilian honour. Yashodhara, a beautiful chanteuse from Delhi, had just started to croon throatily, when Amrita, Simi Garewal’s sister, came to our table to whisper they’d received a call about a terrorist attack at the Oberoi and Taj hotels. Five minutes later, while all of us were desperately calling our contacts for grim confirmations, we heard two loud blasts –terror came directly at us…. the sound hit me in the solar plexus…. and there was no place to run. Top cops advised us to stay put. But our children were at home!!!! Stay put. Stay put. They repeated. The streets are unsafe, roads blockaded, police vans hijacked…. there are armed maniacs on the loose hurling hand grenades and firing randomely into the crowd with lethal automatic weapons. Now they are attacking hospitals!! Oh no…. they’ve blown up a petrol pump!! Yes. The one close to our home. Look….. the Taj is on fire! CST …. OH MY GOD…. They are moving rapidly …. the airport is next, and the Marriott. It was like being cast in a macabre, surrealistic horror film . But one without a director to call, “Cut’’. The sight of the Taj burning, is the one that will remain forever etched on my mind – a ghastly and tragic reminder of this city’s vulnerability…. and also it’s grandeur. That is where I was courted, got married.The place I consider my second home. Taj is family. That is where my daughter is getting married ten days from now… or that was the dream…. the plan.Till last night.Today, that beloved heritage building – Mumbai’s pride and joy - is a monument to death and destruction. The Taj has always been an inspiring emblem of India’s defiance and glory when it was built in 1903 by a great son of Mumbai, Sir Jamshedji Tata, to let the British know that there can be a magnificent hotel built by Indians, for Indians. As I watched the flames engulfing the top floor, my tears flowed for those incredibly brave men and women from the hospitality industry who performed such a stupendous job, along with the others, in saving as many lives as possible. The terrorists picked their targets well – by hitting Mumbai’s most-loved symbols of wealth and prosperity, cosmopolitanism and progress, they succeeded in their mission of demonstrating to the world just how simple it is to attack iconic institutions and hold a teeming metropolis to ransom.Yes. My daughter will get married. And yes,the ceremony will be at the Taj - burnt…. but not bowed. We will always love it. Terrorists may destroy a structure. But our souls are our own. http://shobhaade.blogspot.com/Citizens Initiative for Peace Smruti koppikar, Bureau Chief for Outlook India, who was my teacher at SCM sent the group this info: The Citizens Initiative for Peace- will be meeting on Tuesday Dec. 2nd at 5.30 pm at the YMCA International House to complete the planning for the Human Chain by everyone under a general banner of Mumbai for Peace- on December 10th in Mumbai. The draft flyer for the event is below. The government has indicated that they will give permission. We now have to see that every woman, man and child participate in the chain! Please come to the preparatory meeting. Regards A hundred organisations/individuals (and growing) of 'Mumbai for Peace'. Join "Human Chain" in South Mumbai, afternoon 1 pm on December 10th, 2008 International Human Rights Day! SAY NO TO TERROR! SAY NO TO VIOLENCE! We, the people of Mumbai, from all walks of life, of all faiths, all linguistic groups, all ages, will express our commitment to peace, and our condemnation of terror and violence in any form, by coming out on the streets on the day when the world will be commemorating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948. The theme for 2008, which is "Dignity and justice" has a poignant resonance for the people of Mumbai, traumatized and fearful after the attack on its spirit by criminals who are without a shred of humanity or conscience. We demand:
NO MORE SILENCE! WE MUST SPEAK OUT! Thoughts on Mumbaikars On Ali's webpage, I found Vrushali's featured blog. She has several articles dedicated to this topic, but this one is the most recent - Thirteen years too late. The judgements in the 93 blasts case will unfold in the coming months, with the announcement of the sentences for those found guilty. Sentences that range from five years to life imprisonment. Five years? For helping destroy a city? It's not even a slap on the wrist; it's kissing the Godfather's hand, with the violin score in the background.
Ask most Mumbaikars about what they expect from the verdict and you'll probably get just a resigned sigh. Because they've learned over the years, to expect nothing. 'Why stress about it -- the real masterminds won't be caught anyway,' is what one hears constantly. Maybe it's fair enough, given the general perception about justice in India. But is it ok to be apathetic, and just pass it off as just another failure of justice? Have we just stopped feeling that sense of outrage? Because it's more convenient for us to collectively be comfortably numb?
Can the city afford to forget its pockmarked past? America will make sure the world doesn't forget 9 / 11, here in Mumbai, come rain, riot or a couple of blasts, we're all ready to head to work, briefcases packed, ties neatly tucked in, dupattas firmly knotted, focusing only on making it in time to smell the armpits in the nine-seventeen fast to churchgate. An attitude that's euphemistically called the spirit of Mumbai or its counterpart, the spirit of survival. But does survival mean erasing the past? We'll forget the dead, we'll forget the injured, unless it happens to be someone we know. We'll forget the riots, the blasts that came later and walk unblinkingly into the future. Maybe that's the problem with Mumbai - that we forget all too easily. Eyewitness Account This one is written by a dear friend. I had written to her when I heard about the terrorists, and never heard back until yesterday. Yes, I was worried - - and then I get an email from her with a link to her initial report. Eyewitness account: A date with terrorAliefya Vahanvaty / Forbes-Network18
Late in the evening on Wednesday, November 26, 2008, Mumbai eventually got its very own 9/11. Watching room after room at one of the most majestic and stately symbols of the city, the Taj Mahal Hotel, go up in flames it was hard not to ask the same incredulous and seemingly naive question, "Why do they hate us?" 11.30 pm: I start out at the other side of town from Colaba, at Vile Parle east on the western express highway, where the wreck of the taxi and the fresh red stains on the concrete were being white chalked by the investigating team: It is believed the taxi was heading towards the international airport loaded with RDX when its consignment blew up, killing five including the two passengers (suspected terrorists) and driver. Vijay, a 17-year-old who lives in the hutment by the road, recounts a terrifying sight. He was just sitting down to dinner when he heard the blast. He went out to see and a few steps out of his front door, was greeted with the dismembered head of one of the victims. Vijay has seen his share of calamity during the floods of 26/7/05 and then again during the train blasts of 11/7/06. He states matter-of-factly, this is another date with terror he will never forget. 12.15 am: There are rumours of a hold-up at a suburban hotel, but it turns out to be a hoax call, which nonetheless gets the hotel and the police to sound a red alert in the area. In the meanwhile there are unconfirmed reports of shootouts and casualties in south Mumbai. After a few minutes of deliberating, I jump into a cab with three photojournalists from three different publications who were heading in that direction. Expecting to be stopped at every bend, we keep prepping our taxi driver on do's and don'ts in case the police stops us. Between non-stop phone calls from colleagues with updates on the escalating battle scene, we caution the driver to slow down to a snail's speed the minute he sees a red light and stick to the narrow, quiet bylanes instead of the main roads as far as he can. We warn him to stay with his cab at all times. We were reassuring and preparing ourselves for whatever lay ahead. He simply nodded and drove as directed. We made it to Haji Ali without seeing a single police car. 1.45 am: At Haji Ali, we encounter the first police blockade. They tell us in no uncertain terms that it is dangerous to carry on and demand that we turn back. We turn left towards Nana Chowky and continue towards town. Just then we receive news of a gun-down at Chowpatty. We already have reports that ATS chief Hemant Karkare, additional CP (eastern region) Ashok Kamte and top encounter cop Vijay Salaskar were among those gunned down in an ambush by two terrorists near Azad Maidan a short while ago. The Mumbai police were out to get those who had taken out their best. At Sukh Sagar, the taxi driver hesitates a brief instant, waiting for some indication that he should turn left. The silence in the taxi is loud enough a sign for him to turn right. He parks at the side of the road and we cautiously approach the carnage in front of us. The Skoda carrying the terrorists who were believed to have killed the Mumbai police top brass is untouched at the front. The bullet holes instead have shattered the glass at the rear. Cartridges, shoes, bloody notes and other debris are being collected for evidence. The cops there have blood stained clothes but they also have their revenge—both terrorists dead. "We will not let our officers' death be in vain," says the officer on site. Girguam is also where, in the stillness of the night, watching Mumbai police turn armed weapons at approaching vehicles, we get a real sense of the magnitude of what is happening that night to the city. The city has been scarred before. The city has been gravely wounded before. The city has bled before. How bad is it going to be this time around? Beyond imagination? Most certainly. But then, didn't we think that in 1993? In 2006? 2.30 am: We return 15-minutes later from the scene under Girguam bridge to our taxi and again, it is silence that prompts the taxi driver to continue down Marine Drive towards the Oberoi Hotel. We approach Oberoi around 2.45 am: OB vans occupy one side of the street. Ambulances and fire brigade vehicles are on the other side. Joining the media personnel flocked outside the hotel, stories are exchanged on who has been where and seen what. "CST station was the worst. An AK-47 on rampage is the worst nightmare to happen in Mumbai," says one reporter. No one has any confirmed reports on what exactly is happening inside the hotel. Yes, there are terrorists holed up there. Yes, there are hostages. Firing. The fire brigade personnel are huddled in a group on the parapet at Marine Drive. The medical team is waiting, disposable gloves and masks on. Anxious friends and relatives, guests staying at the hotel who were returning from previous engagements are being calmed by authorities. Shocked cops from the ATS are coming to grips with the loss of Hemant Karkare and others. 3.30 am: By now, our party of four has dwindled to two. We decide to head towards the epicentre. Again to our incredulity, there is no police presence from Marine Drive, down Vidhan Bhavan near Churchgate station until we reach Regal cinema. Our taxi driver says he will park near the museum, insists he will wait for us and for the first time issues a softly spoken, "Be careful." 3.45 am: We walk down Colaba Causeway and take the first left from Regal cinema to head towards the Taj. I have walked down these streets a few hundred times over the years, at various times of the day and night. I have lived at the adequate Moti Mahal hotel here for a brief month. I have spent many an enjoyable and eventful evening at Leopold Café. The walk from Regal to Taj has never felt so heavy at each step of the way. The first glimpse of the Taj is serene. The night sky dotted with stars and the impressive vertical lines of the new building and the iconic dome of the old Taj. A few steps more and the floodlights from the fire brigade illuminate the grim reality. The Taj stands pitch black except for the flames licking the top floor of the old building. Gun shots, armoured vehicles, more fire brigade vehicles, ambulances and of course, a sea of journalists. It doesn't take me long to find my colleague there at the scene. We huddle together with a few other journalists at the Apollo Bunder side of the Taj. From there we have a clear view of the fire brigade personnel attempting to control the flames in a room in the far left corner of the old building. But soon the room after that is seen glowing orange. And then the room after that. Wooden balcony frames, foam mattresses and other combustible material are a perfect recipe for disaster. Glass cracking under intense heat crashes to the ground below. There is no more gunfire. It is all quiet except for the crackling fire. It is all dark except for the glowing embers. 6.00 am: At the first sign of day break on November 27, the fire brigade with their elevator ladders swing into action, rescuing harried guests trapped inside the old Taj building. Several of those trapped are brought down to safety, wrapped with white towels and bed-sheets as protection against smoke inhalation. Large hoses are dousing the flames. We are kept a safe distance away by the police and with our lenses capture the worst disaster to have struck the heart of this city by the bay. As night turns to day, we continue to document and to witness. And yet, it is difficult not to be affected by the heat of the burning Taj. It is difficult not to be affected by the cold bloodedness of the attackers. 7.30 am: As the fire brigade finishes its operations, we think the worst is over. We are hungry and thirsty and want to carry on with the business of filing our stories and pictures. Making our way towards the Gateway of India side of the Taj we mingle with journalists and police attempting to piece together a cohesive timeline of events. It is a false dawn, the quiet before the storm. Gunshots from the Taj get us running for cover. Retaliatory gunfire from the ground follows. Over the next few minutes, the Army has taken positions. The media is cordoned off. The Gateway of India has snipers strategically placed. The area is declared a no-man's zone. No one can move. No one wants to. And then one more window in the old Taj is seen glowing. 8.00 am: The Army commandos storm the new building. BEST buses are put into service to transport civilians to safety. More ambulances arrive. Tense anticipation fills the air. An hour later, the first group of rescued civilians emerges from the building, escorted by armed personnel. They make it as far as the side of the road before shots are fired again. They instinctively duck for cover. So do we. A few minutes of anxious silence later they are quietly herded into a waiting BEST bus. An injured person—it is unclear whether he is a civilian or suspected militant—is carried on a stretcher to a waiting ambulance. Soon a few more civilians are escorted from the hotel. The media get access to some sound bytes from frightened employees. "It was the worst thing I have lived through in my life. I was here on a business trip and my wife decided to accompany me. We were due to leave tomorrow in the evening and return home to Tokyo. Now I have no idea where my wife is and I just don't know what to do and what to think. I just don't know…" a Japanese middle-aged man is narrating to a journalist nearby. No one is able to say what really is going on. And then another blast is heard. Eerie silence envelopes the area. And then more Army personnel storm into the building. 12.30 pm: Morning turns to noon. It has been quiet for a couple of hours since the last blast. We soon find out why. Everybody makes a beeline for Nariman House, a few streets away. A couple of those being held hostage, including a two-year-old girl, are rescued. But the terrorists are still holed in there with more hostages. Army personnel explain that it is difficult to storm either the Taj, the Oberoi or Nariman House because the safety of innocents being held would be gravely compromised. And so they can only take very small steps at a time to gain a foothold in the garrisons the terrorists have set up. 5.00 pm: At the Taj, again more gunfire and soon another room on fire. It seems like the militants have done their groundwork very well indeed. They make very few mistakes. It is surreal to stand and stare at immaculate window dressings of the best luxury names in the business while the top floor of the same building is being gutted. As twilight descends, the atmosphere is almost relaxed. Rescue operations at the Oberoi have been a success. CST station has been cleaned up and trains were running, albeit sparsely populated. We manage to get a meal. 10 pm: We return to the Taj. It has now been 24 hours. Fire still glows. No one has any confirmed figures on how many rescued, how many still trapped, how many terrorists still holed up. We are exhausted. It is time to head home, rest and see what November 28 would bring. Aliefya Vahanvaty is chief copy editor with the new business magazine to be launched by Network 18 in alliance with Forbes of USAhttp://ibnlive.in.com/news/eyewitness-account-a-date-with-terror/79339-3.html Mumbai Terrorist Attack So many people have expressed their feelings -- Thought I should share these writings. This is one of the last emails... will keep adding to this list, some old, some new - - but all heart-rendering, and relevant. As the Fires Die: The Terror of the Aftermath As the smoke lifts from Mumbai, skepticism must prevail over those conjectures which support the official state narrative. It is crucial to increase the pressure for transparency and accountability at this moment to ensure that India doesn't slide into the same state as post-9/11 USA. By Biju Mathew This piece originally appeared in Samar 31, http://www.samarmagazine.org/archive/issue.php?issue_num=31 published online December 1st, 2008. The deaths continue even as I write this. The death toll stands at 195. And of the several hundred injured some may not survive. It is now official. The siege is over. The last of the gunmen inside the Taj Hotel has been shot dead. The Oberoi/Trident hotel was cleared earlier today and the Nariman House Jewish Center at the corner of Third Pasta Lane on the Colaba Causeway was stormed close to 24 hours ago. The other targets - the Leopold Cafe (a popular tourist hangout), the CST railway terminus (also called the Victoria Terminus), the Metro Cinema, the Cama Hospital, all seem to be targets the gunmen attacked as they zoned in on the hotels and Nariman House. In the end this has become a story of two sets of men with guns. The human story of the innocents who died, the hotel staff who kept their cool and moved guests around the hotel through the service entryways and exits, those who helped each other escape, will not really make it to the headlines. The maintenance worker at the Oberoi who shielded guests and took the bullets in his stomach will remain unsung. The hospital orderlies who ran in and out with stretchers carrying the wounded - each time not knowing if they will make it back themselves to the ambulance, will not be noted. The several trainee chefs at the Taj who fell to bullets even as other kitchen workers escorted guests away from the firing and hid them inside a private clubroom will not be written up in the book of heroes. The young waiter at Leopold who was to leave to work in a Cape Town restaurant will soon be forgotten. The two young men who dragged an Australian tourist shot in the leg away from the Leopold entrance and carried her to a taxi will not even identify themselves so that she can thank them. These stories, in as much as they are told, will remain on the lips of only the workers, the guests and the tourists who helped each other. The officials will try and produce a clean story to tell the world. And we know the clean story is untrue. The official story that has already begun to emerge is one that may have some facts embedded in it. But we must remember that between every two facts is a lot of conjecture. The conjectures that unite the few facts (16 gunmen, AK47s, grenades, passports of multiple nationalities, boats on which at least some of them arrived, a dead Anti-Terror Squad (ATS) chief, Hemant Karkare, who was heading the investigation against the Hindu Right wings' terror campaign, the gunmen trying to identify British and American citizens) makes the story. The story then is as much a product of the conjecture as it is of the facts. And there are certain stories that we are already oriented towards. The conjectures that create that story - the story we are already prepared for - is the one the State will dole out for our consumption. Already the conjectures that will serve the State, are out there in great profusion. Several reporters have noted that the gunmen were clean-shaven, dressed in jeans and T-shirts. The silent conjecture is that they were expecting and were surprised by the fact that these men did not have beards and did not sport the Muslim prayer cap. Every newspaper worth its salt - the Times of India, the Jerusalem Post, the Independent from the UK, among scores of others - have already run commentary on the unsecured coastline of India. The conjectural subtext is that securing the coastline is possible and if India had done so, this attack would have been prevented. There is also a quick labeling going on -- India's 9/11. The subtext is that India could and should act as the US did after 9/11 - decisively and with great aggression. There is also the subtext that the Indian State is soft on terror that adds to the US-tough-on-terror contrast. Sadanand Dhume, writing in the Wall Street Journal, has castigated the Indian government for withdrawing the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) and for preventing states like Gujarat from passing their own version of the draconian worse-than-Patriot Act legislations. Neither Mr. Dhume, nor the several reporters who will now write stories about how the POTA repeal represents the Indian State's soft attitude towards terror will ever feel the need to explain how POTA could have prevented this attack. The dead are on the floor. The vultures are moving in. The conjecture will try to unite the country into a series of unexamined positions. That POTA must be recalled. That States must be allowed to pass even more draconian laws. That Hindu terror is not a big issue and must be forgotten for now - especially now that we may not find an honest policeman or woman to head the ATS. That the defense budget must go up. That the coastline must be secured.. None of the well educated masters of the media will write that the 7000 odd kilometer coastline cannot be protected - that all it will translate to is billions in contracts for all and sundry including Israeli and American consultants. Nobody will write that a hundred POTAs will not prevent a terror attack like this one; that Guantanamo Bay has not yielded a single break through. Nobody will write that higher defense budgets have been more often correlated with insecure and militarized lives for ordinary citizens. Nobody will write that almost without exception all of US post 9/111 policies have been disasters. Bin Laden is still around, I am told and so is the Al Qaeda. The number of fundamentalist Christians, Muslims, Hindus and Jews have probably gone up over the last decade. So much for good policy. But the conjecture will go on. The foreign hand and its internal partner will be floated without ever naming anything precise. But the country will read it just as it is meant to be read - Pakistan and the Indian Muslim. Everything will rest on the supposed confession of the one gunman who has been captured. A Pakistani from Faridkot, I am told. Why should we believe it? Didn't the same Indian State frame all the supposed accomplices in the Parliament attack case? Didn't the same Indian State claim that the assassins of Chattisinghpura were from across the border until that story fell apart? And more recently, didn't the same Indian State finally agree that all the accused in the Mecca Masjid bombings were actually innocent? And even if Mr. Assassin supposedly from Faridkot did say what he did say - why should we believe him? Why is it so difficult to believe that he has his lines ready and scripted? If he was willing to die for whatever cause he murdered for, then can he not lie? Oh the lie detector test - that completely discredited science that every militarized State trots out. And the media love the lie detector test because it is the best scientific garb you can give to conjecture. I certainly don't know the truth. But I do know that there is more than enough reason for skepticism. The problem is that we need a new theory of the State. We need to re-understand the State. There is such unanimity when it comes to analyzing the Pakistani State - that the ISI, and if not all of the ISI, at least a segment of it, is a rogue element Furthermore, that its bosses may not be sitting in Islamabad, but perhaps elsewhere in the country or even abroad. If we can accept that about the Pakistani State, why is it so difficult to accept it about the Indian State? We all know that Colin Powell was a kind of a patsy - a fall guy, who trotted out some lies on behalf of a segment of the neo-conservative movement firmly entrenched within the American State (which Obama will not touch). We also know that if the ISI has a rogue element in it, it was in good part created by the CIA. Then why do we think that the same guys couldn't render another State - such as the US - itself hollow from the inside. The contemporary State is a different being. For every story of money-corruption you hear, there could just as well be one of political-corruption. Every vested interest who locates himself inside the State apparatus is not just a vested interest going after money but could just as well be securing the space for creating a certain politics. The RSS has a long history of trying to take over the bureaucracy, doesn't it? So do the neo-cons and so do the jamaatis. Then why do we believe in a theory of the State that is unified and with liberal goals? The history of the liberal State and its relationship with capitalism of all types is a simple one. The longer that relationship persists the more corrupt and hollow the liberal State gets, leaving the space open for political ideologies to occupy its very insides. The logic for this is inherent in the very system. If profit is above all, then given the power the State has, it must be bought. Cheney is no different from Shivraj Patil, and Ambani is no different from Halliburton. They are both part of the story of hollowing the State out. And once the hollowing process begins, every ideological force can find its way in, as long as it has resources. The archetypal bourgeois liberal State is over. It never really existed, but what we have at the end of four decades of neo-liberalism bears no resemblance to the ideal formulation whatsoever. What we have instead is a series of hollowed out States with their nooks and crannies, their departments and offices populated with specific neo-conservative ideological interests. The US has its variant. India has its. And Israel its very own. It is incapable of delivering the truth, and not just the truth, it is only capable of producing lies. If this story of skepticism makes sense then we have only one choice. To understand that it is crucial to increase the pressure for transparency at this moment, to be relentless in our demand for openness and detail, in our call to ensure that no investigation or inquiry that was in place be halted and that every one of these be subjected to public scrutiny. It is our responsibility to reject the discourse of secrecy based on security and demand specific standards of transparency. What we should demand is that every senior minister and every senior intelligence officer be examined and the records be made available to the public. What we must demand is that an officer of impeccable record be found to replace Hemant Karkare. What we must demand is that we get explanations of how a POTA clone would have stopped this crime. What we must ask is how POTA or the Patriot Act could have ever helped prevent terror? What we must do is support the Karkare family in their demand for a full investigation of his death in the company of the encounter specialist- Salaskar. What we must have is an open debate on every single case of terror over the last decade in India. When I am in Bombay, I always stay at a friend's on Third Pasta Lane. Each afternoon I would walk out and see the Nariman House. I have wondered what the decrepit building was. I have always contrasted the drabness of the building with the colorful sign on the next building that announces Colaba Sweet House. The next time I won't wonder. I will know that it was one of the places where the drama that inaugurated India's renewed march towards fascism unfolded. Unless we act. Unless we act with speed and determination demanding transparency and accountability and a careful rewriting of the story of terror in India. Only a renewed movement can ensure that India doesn't slide into the same state as post 9/11 USA. Biju Mathew is a member of the Campaign to Stop Funding Hate and the Coalition Against Genocide and is a co-founder of the New York Taxi Worker Alliance August 27 Trip TV Pays Hotel Guests To Video Hotel Room Tripr.tv: Pays Hotels Guests to Video Their Hotel Room! First Web Portal Which Pays Travelers for Their Videos Launched MIAMI, Florida, For anyone who stays in hotels, there's a new way of making money - without any effort. Simply make a short film of your room, recording your comments, and send it to the newly launched international travel website"Tripr.tv". When someone books a room at the hotel as a result of watching your video, you get a cut of the booking commission. Launching all around the world today after 6 months of very successful trials, Tripr.tv (www.tripr.tv) is the first company of its kind - showing potential hotel guests what a hotel is really like, unlike the corporate pictures and videos which the hotels themselves show you. "Almost a thousand hotels are already on the site, but we want tens of thousands more," explained Mr. Jan Kooman, Tripr.tv CEO. "We are basically a kind of YouTube for the hotel business. Moving images are much more realistic than the, often outdated and glamorized, pictures which hotels themselves show. Our way, potential guests can really trust the hotel. When you're filming for Tripr.tv, you're actually walking around your room. Everyone can see the truth!"
About Tripr.tv | As Tripr.tv has arrangements with hotel booking
companies, which pay commission, Tripr.tv forwards part of this
commission to the video maker, averaging $10 per booking. The site was
launched in "beta" format in January 2008 and has already attracted
great interest from hotels and guests. Hotels realize that it's a great
opportunity for potential guests to see what other guests think - and
to see what they see. Recently, Tripr.tv has been funded by Greenhouse
Innovation, venture capital firm of Mr. Sander Andreae and Mr. Marc
Duijndam. Duijndam is former managing director at Google. Found this online....Visit www.triptv.com for more info... June 28 Typing Aum on the computer screen Try this! To get the Om symbol on your computer screen, open MS Word
and key in backslash ( \ ) in Wingdings font. You will type in Om! The Green Revolution I am now the Co-Chair of the Green Committee at work. I've started to think more about the different things I can do for the environment. I thought this was an interesting article for green-conscious consumers: Top
10 Green Hotels in the U.S. (10 top listings, Gayot)
As more and more things claim to be green, how can you tell which are truly environmentally friendly, and which are just trying to cash in on the latest trend? About 30 hotels in the U.S. now boast LEED Certification (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design); a badge of honor handed out by the U.S. Green Building Council, but there are also accommodations without a certification that still provide green design elements. From low-flush toilets to the use of non-toxic materials and cleaning supplies to recycling programs and water conservation, here are the ten best green hotels across America, where you can enjoy your stay without harming Mother Earth. ___________________________
San Francisco
___________________________ Chicago
___________________________
___________________________ Las Vegas
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
Ten Top Wines for Barbeques Welcome to Summer! Here's how to partayy the Gayot's way... Top
10 Wines for Barbecues
|
This user currently is not registered with Windows Live QnA account. Click here to learn more and get started.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|